ReviewEuropean journal of plant pathology2006
Advances in molecular phytodiagnostics - new solutions for old problems.
Review in European journal of plant pathology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-Based Development of Genus-Specific PCR Primers forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Catching the ElusiveBiotech (Basel (Switzerland)) · 2026Review
- Sequencing airborne DNA to monitor crop pathogens and pests.iScience · 2025Article
- Traditional to technological advancements in Ganoderma detection methods in oil palm.Folia microbiologica · 2024Review
- Cross-pathogenicity of Phytophthora palmivora associated with bud rot disease of oil palm and development of biomarkers for detection.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Article
- PhytoPipe: a phytosanitary pipeline for plant pathogen detection and diagnosis using RNA-seq data.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Two-step method for rapid isolation of genomic DNA and validation of R81T insecticide resistance mutation inSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2023Article
- Identification of a TuMV isolate (TuMV-ZR) from Pseudostellaria heterophylla and its development into a viral expression vector.Virus research · 2023Article
- Genosensors as an alternative diagnostic sensing approaches for specific detection of virus species: A review of common techniques and outcomes.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2022Review
- Detection of Cucumber green mottle mosaic virus in low-concentration virus-infected seeds by improved one-step pre-amplification RT-qPCR.Plant methods · 2022Article
- Intra-Laboratory Evaluation of DNA Extraction Methods and Assessment of a Droplet Digital PCR for the Detection of Xanthomonas citri pv. citri on Different Citrus SpeciesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- A reverse transcription-cross-priming amplification method with lateral flow dipstick assay for the rapid detection of Bean pod mottle virus.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Whole-Genome and Transcriptome Sequencing-Based Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Plant pest surveillance: from satellites to molecules.Emerging topics in life sciences · 2021Review
- Wisteria Vein Mosaic Virus Detected for the First Time in Iran from an Unknown Host by Analysis of Aphid Vectors.The plant pathology journal · 2020Article
- Potential Diagnostic Systems for Coronavirus Detection: a Critical Review.Biological procedures online · 2020Review
- Nested and TaqManMolecular biology reports · 2019Article
- Detection of disease inPeerJ · 2019Article
- Tissue culture and next-generation sequencing: A combined approach for detecting yam (Physiological and molecular plant pathology · 2019Article
- Rapid detection of potyviruses from crude plant extracts.Analytical biochemistry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the last decade, developments in molecular (nucleic acid-based) diagnostic methods have made significant improvements in the detection of plant pathogens. By using methods such as the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the range of targets that can now be reliably diagnosed has grown to the extent that there are now extremely few, known pathogens that cannot be identified accurately by using laboratory-based diagnostics. However, while the detection of pathogens in individual, infected samples is becoming simpler, there are still many scenarios that present a major challenge to diagnosticians and plant pathologists. Amongst these are the detection of pathogens in soil or viruses in their vectors, high throughput testing and the development of generic methods, that allow samples to be simultaneously screened for large numbers of pathogens. Another major challenge is to develop robust technologies that avoid the reliance on well-equipped central laboratories and making reliable diagnostics available to pathologists in the field or in less-developed countries. In recent years, much of the research carried out on phytodiagnostics has focussed in these areas and as a result many novel, routine diagnostic tests are becoming available. This has been possible due to the introduction of new molecular technologies such real-time PCR and microarrays. These advances have been complemented by the development of new nucleic acid extraction methods, increased automation, reliable internal controls, assay multiplexing and generic amplification methods. With developments in new hardware, field-portable real-time PCR is now also a reality and offers the prospect of ultra-rapid, on-site molecular diagnostics for the first time. In this paper, the development and implementation of new diagnostic methods based upon novel molecular techniques is presented, with specific examples given to demonstrate how these new methods can be used to overcome some long-standing problems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.