ArticleNonlinear dynamics2014
A two-step high-risk immunization based on high-risk immunization.
Article in Nonlinear dynamics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, the two-step high-risk immunization was investigated based on high-risk immunization for the SIRS model in small-world networks and scale-free networks. First, the effects of various immunization schemes are studied and compared. When the number of immune is same, the research result shows that the immune effect of the two-step high-risk immunization strategy is not the best nor the worst. However, the practicability is better compare with others. Furthermore, by changing the proportional of immunization the optimal immune effect can be achieved in the two-step high-risk immunization. Computation results verify that the two-step high-risk immunization is effective, and it is economic and feasible in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.