ArticleAerobiologia2015
Identification of airborne bacteria by 16S rDNA sequencing, MALDI-TOF MS and the MIDI microbial identification system.
Article in Aerobiologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria in urine of dogs rescued from Southern Brazil floods.Veterinary research communications · 2025Article
- Ornithinibacillus xuwenensis sp. nov., A Novel Thermotolerant Bacterium Isolated from Mangrove Sediment.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Comparative genomic analyses of the genus Robertmurraya and proposal of the novel species Robertmurraya mangrovi sp. nov., isolated from mangrove soil.Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · 2024Article
- Saccharopolyspora mangrovi sp. nov., a novel mangrove soil actinobacterium with distinct metabolic potential revealed by comparative genomic analysis.Archives of microbiology · 2024Article
- Comparison of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and 16S rDNA sequencing for identification of environmental bacteria: a case study of cave mussel-associated culturable microorganisms.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024Article
- Efficient low-temperature wastewater treatment byFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Streptomonospora mangrovi sp. nov., isolated from mangrove soil showing similar metabolic capabilities, but distinct secondary metabolites profiles.Archives of microbiology · 2023Article
- Isolation, identification, and significance of salivaryFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
- Airborne bacterial species in indoor air and association with physical factors.UCL open. Environment · 2023Article
- A comprehensive review of microbial contamination in the indoor environment: sources, sampling, health risks, and mitigation strategies.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Halomonas sedimenti sp. nov., a Halotolerant Bacterium Isolated from Deep-Sea Sediment of the Southwest Indian Ocean.Current microbiology · 2021Article
- Evaluating the Bacterial Diversity from the Southwest Coast of India Using Fatty Acid Methyl Ester Profiles.Current microbiology · 2021Article
- Simulation of MICROBACT Strip Assay Using Colored Liquids to Demonstrate Identification of Unknown Gram-Negative Organisms in Undergraduate Laboratory.Journal of microbiology & biology education · 2018Article
- Whole-Cell MALDI-TOF MS Versus 16S rRNA Gene Analysis for Identification and Dereplication of Recurrent Bacterial Isolates.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to collect and identify airborne bacteria in Norway, Sweden and Finland and to compare three different technologies for identifying collected airborne bacterial isolates: the "gold standard" method 16S rDNA sequencing, MALDI-TOF MS using the MALDI Biotyper 2.0 and the MIDI Sherlock
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.