ArticleAerobiologia2015
Characteristics of airborne
Article in Aerobiologia, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of bioaerosol composition and public health implications in high-traffic urban areas of Southwest, Nigeria.Environmental research communications · 2024Article
- High Bacterial Contamination Load of Self-Service Facilities in Sakaka City, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia, with Reduced Sensitivity to Some Antimicrobials.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Potential Causes of Spread of Antimicrobial Resistance and Preventive Measures in One Health Perspective-A Review.Infection and drug resistance · 2023Review
- Surveillance and prevalence of antimicrobial resistant bacteria from public settings within urban built environments: Challenges and opportunities for hygiene and infection control.Environment international · 2021Review
- Airborne Staphylococcus aureus in different environments-a review.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2019Review
- Airborne MRSA and Total Staphylococcus aureus as Associated With Particles of Different Sizes on Pig Farms.Annals of work exposures and health · 2018Article
- Bacterial pathogens were detected from human exhaled breath using a novel protocol.Journal of aerosol science · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the concentration and size distribution of airborne culturable
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.