Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32214335›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

EpCAM-independent isolation of circulating tumor cells with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell phenotypes using ApoStream® in patients with breast cancer treated with primary systemic therapy.

Fanny Le Du, Takeo Fujii, Kumiko Kida, Darren W Davis, Minjeong Park, Diane D Liu, Weiguo Wu, Mariana Chavez-MacGregor, Carlos H Barcenas, Vicente Valero and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Recent Advances in Methods for Circulating Tumor Cell Detection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Molecular and Circulating Biomarkers in Patients with Glioblastoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Fanny Le DuDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4372-5832
Takeo FujiiDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Kumiko KidaDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Darren W DavisApoCell, Inc., Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Minjeong ParkDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Diane D LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Weiguo WuApoCell, Inc., Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Mariana Chavez-MacGregorDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Carlos H BarcenasDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Vicente ValeroDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Debu TripathyDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
James M ReubenDepartment of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Naoto T UenoDepartment of Breast Medical Oncology, Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTumor cells with a mesenchymal phenotype and/or cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) are known to contribute to metastasis and drug resistance. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) undergoing epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and CTCs reflecting a dedifferentiated CSC phenotype may not be detected using only an anti-EpCAM antibody to capture them. We used an antibody-independent CTC enrichment platform, ApoStream®, which does not rely on any antibody, including anti-EpCAM, to capture EMT- and CSC-CTCs in breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and correlated them to pathological complete response (pCR).

methodsBlood samples from newly diagnosed breast cancer patients were prospectively collected before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (T0), after chemotherapy but before surgery (T1), and after surgery (T2) and processed using ApoStream. CTCs detected were stained with additional markers to define 3 CTC subsets with the following phenotypes: epithelial CTCs (CK+, EpCAM+ or E-cadherin+), EMT-CTCs (β-catenin+ or vimentin+), and CSC-CTCs (CD44+ and CD24low).

resultsWe enrolled 55 patients, 47 of which had data for analysis. EMT-CTCs were detected in 57%, 62%, and 72% and CSC-CTCs in 9%, 22%, and 19% at the T0, T1, and T2 time points, respectively. Counts of epithelial (P = 0.225) and EMT (P = 0.522) phenotypes of CTCs at T0 did not significantly predict pCR. Moreover, no correlation between CTC count change and pCR was demonstrated.

conclusionsApoStream was successful in detecting EMT-CTCs among patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. However, EMT-/CSC-CTC counts did not correlate with pCR. Due to the small sample size and heterogeneity of this patient population, further study in a larger cohort of molecularly homogeneous patients is warranted.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntigens, NeoplasmBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCadherinsCell CountCell Line, TumorEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingNeoplastic Stem CellsAntigens, NeoplasmBCL2 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorCadherinsEPCAM protein, humanEpithelial Cell Adhesion MoleculeProto-Oncogene Proteins c-bcl-2Vimentin

Identifiers

PMID32214335
PMCPMC7098555
OpenAlexW3014045442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.