Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32214320›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Determining the viability of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae using fluorescence assays: An application for water treatment.

Laura Braun, Lucinda Hazell, Alexander J Webb, Fiona Allan, Aidan M Emery, Michael R Templeton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Efficacy assessment of miltefosine and curcumin againstAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Chlorination of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura BraunDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9319-0859
Lucinda HazellDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexander J WebbSection of Structural and Synthetic Biology, Department of Infectious Disease, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fiona AllanWolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratories, Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.
Aidan M EmeryWolfson Wellcome Biomedical Laboratories, Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9028-8586
Michael R TempletonDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBNatural History Museum · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSchistosome cercariae are the human-infectious stage of the Schistosoma parasite. They are shed by snail intermediate hosts living in freshwater, and penetrate the skin of the human host to develop into schistosomes, resulting in schistosomiasis infection. Water treatment (e.g. filtration or chlorination) is one way of cutting disease transmission; it kills or removes cercariae to provide safe water for people to use for activities such as bathing or laundry as an alternative to infested lakes or rivers. At present, there is no standard method for assessing the effectiveness of water treatment processes on cercariae. Examining cercarial movement under a microscope is the most common method, yet it is subjective and time-consuming. Hence, there is a need to develop and verify accurate, high-throughput assays for quantifying cercarial viability.

methodWe tested two fluorescence assays for their ability to accurately determine cercarial viability in water samples, using S. mansoni cercariae released from infected snails in the Schistosomiasis Collection at the Natural History Museum, London. These assays consist of dual stains, namely a vital and non-vital dye; fluorescein diacetate (FDA) and Hoechst, and FDA and Propidium Iodide. We also compared the results of the fluorescence assays to the viability determined by microscopy.

conclusionBoth fluorescence assays can detect the viability of cercariae to an accuracy of at least 92.2% ± 6.3%. Comparing the assays to microscopy, no statistically significant difference was found between the method's viability results. However, the fluorescence assays are less subjective and less time-consuming than microscopy, and therefore present a promising method for quantifying the viability of schistosome cercariae in water samples.

Indexed as

Water PurificationAnimalsCercariaDisease Transmission, InfectiousMicroscopy, FluorescenceParasite LoadSchistosoma mansoniSchistosomiasis mansoniStaining and LabelingTreatment OutcomeWaterWater

Identifiers

PMID32214320
PMCPMC7138324
OpenAlexW3013039120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.