ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Ten Simple Rules for organizing a non-real-time web conference.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Open Science Practices in Psychiatric Genetics: A Primer.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2024Review
- Ten simple rules for organizing a special session at a scientific conference.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Ten simple rules for improving communication among scientists.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Ten simple rules for switching from face-to-face to remote conference: An opportunity to estimate the reduction in GHG emissions.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Ten simple rules for attending your first conference.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Moving academic conferences online: Understanding patterns of delegate engagement.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- When international academic conferences go virtual.Scientometrics · 2021Article
- Online conferences for better learning.Ecology and evolution · 2020Article
- Ten simple rules to make your research more sustainable.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.