ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Seven quick tips for analysis scripts in neuroimaging.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gain efficiency with streamlined and automated data processing: Examples from high-throughput monoclonal antibody production.PloS one · 2025Article
- Ten quick tips for computational analysis of medical images.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Developing and reusing bioinformatics data analysis pipelines using scientific workflow systems.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
- Effect of long-term paired associative stimulation on the modulation of cortical sensorimotor oscillations after spinal cord injury.Spinal cord series and cases · 2022Article
- Reproducible, scalable, and shareable analysis pipelines with bioinformatics workflow managers.Nature methods · 2021Review
- Using prototyping to choose a bioinformatics workflow management system.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Assessing Markers of Reproducibility and Transparency in Smoking Behaviour Change Intervention Evaluations.Journal of smoking cessation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.