Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32214217›Full record

ReviewJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020

"Extrauterine growth restriction" and "postnatal growth failure" are misnomers for preterm infants.

Tanis R Fenton, Barbara Cormack, Dena Goldberg, Roseann Nasser, Belal Alshaikh, Misha Eliasziw, William W Hay, Angela Hoyos, Diane Anderson, Frank Bloomfield and 10 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Growth and human milk intake outcomes from postdischarge feedings among very-low-birth-weight preterm infants: A systematic review.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Defining growth faltering and malnutrition among very preterm infants in a neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 18 institutions in 6 countries.

Tanis R FentonCommunity Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. tfenton@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9585-9149
Barbara CormackLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Dena GoldbergCarilion Clinic, Roanoke, VA, USA.
Roseann NasserSaskatchewan Health Authority, Nutrition and Food Services, Regina, SK, Canada.
Belal AlshaikhCommunity Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Misha EliasziwPublic Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
William W HayUniversity of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA.
Angela HoyosClínica del Country, Universidad el Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
Diane AndersonPediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Frank BloomfieldLiggins Institute, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Ian GriffinClinical and Translational Research, Biomedical research Institute of New Jersey, Cedar Knolls, NJ, USA.
Nicholas EmbletonNewcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Niels RochowPediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7990-3904
Sarah TaylorPediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Thibault SenterreNeonatology, University of Liege, CHU de Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Richard J SchanlerNeonatal Services, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra, New York, NY, USA.
Seham ElmrayedCommunity Health Sciences, Institute of Public Health, Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Sharon Groh-WargoPediatrics and Nutrition, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.
David AdamkinPediatrics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
Prakesh S ShahPaediatrics and Institute of HPME, University of Toronto, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
University of Auckland · NZUniversity of Calgary · CAAlberta Health Services · CABaylor College of Medicine · USBiomedical Research Institute · USCarilion Clinic · USCase Western Reserve University · USMcMaster University · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CANorthwell Health · USRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBSaskatchewan Health Authority · CATufts University · USUniversidad El Bosque · COUniversity of Colorado Denver · USUniversity of Liège · BEUniversity of Louisville · USYale University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm infants are increasingly diagnosed as having "extrauterine growth restriction" (EUGR) or "postnatal growth failure" (PGF). Usually EUGR/PGF is diagnosed when weight is <10th percentile at either discharge or 36-40 weeks postmenstrual age. The reasons why the phrases EUGR/PGF are unhelpful include, they: (i) are not predictive of adverse outcome; (ii) are based only on weight without any consideration of head or length growth, proportionality, body composition, or genetic potential; (iii) ignore normal postnatal weight loss; (iv) are usually assessed prior to growth slowing of the reference fetus, around 36-40 weeks, and (v) are usually based on an arbitrary statistical growth percentile cut-off. Focus on EUGR/PGF prevalence may benefit with better attention to nutrition but may also harm with nutrition delivery above infants' actual needs. In this paper, we highlight challenges associated with such arbitrary cut-offs and opportunities for further refinement of understanding growth and nutritional needs of preterm neonates.

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationInfant, PrematureGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornNutritional StatusPatient Discharge

Identifiers

PMID32214217
OpenAlexW3013403853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.