Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32214216›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2020

"Quality of life": parent and neonatologist perspectives.

Shannon Y Adams, Richard Tucker, Melissa A Clark, Beatrice E Lechner

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Integrating parent voices into research at the extremes of prematurity: what are we doing and where should we go?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Narrative neonatology: integrating narrative medicine into the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Infant mode of death in the neonatal intensive care unit: A systematic scoping review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shannon Y AdamsWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA. shannon_adams@brown.edu.
Richard TuckerWomen & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island, Providence, RI, USA.
Melissa A ClarkBrown School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Beatrice E LechnerWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Brown University · USProvidence College · USWomen & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess how physicians and families understand quality of life (QOL) for NICU patients, and to explore the feasibility of developing a standardized definition for QOL. STUDY

designSurveys were developed and administered to neonatologists and eligible families. Quantitative analysis was conducted using standard statistical methods. Qualitative analysis was conducted using NVivo software. Focus groups were conducted with the same groups, and audio recordings were obtained and analyzed for recurring themes.

resultsBoth parents and physicians value QOL as a metric for guiding care in the NICU. Parents were more likely to accept higher levels of disability, while neonatologists were more likely to accept higher levels of dependence on medical equipment. In relation to infant QOL, predominant themes expressed in the parent focus groups were stress levels in the NICU, advocating as parents, and the way in which long-term outcomes were presented by the medical team; in the physician focus group, the ambiguity of predicting outcomes and thus QOL was the main theme.

conclusionsBoth parents and physicians recognize the importance of QOL in the decision-making process for critically ill infants, but the two groups differ in their assessment of what QOL means in this context. These data suggest that QOL cannot be adequately defined for standardized use in a clinical context, and as such, should be used thoughtfully by neonatologists in discussions of end- of-life care.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTerminal CareDecision MakingHumansInfantNeonatologistsParents

Identifiers

PMID32214216
PMCPMC7223787
OpenAlexW3013163073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.