Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32214007›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Recent Advances in Applications of Hybrid Graphene Materials for Metals Removal from Wastewater.

Abdulrahman Abu-Nada, Gordon McKay, Ahmed Abdala

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Synthesis and surface modification of magnetic FeEnvironmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abdulrahman Abu-NadaDivision of Sustainable Development, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, PO Box 34110, Doha, Qatar.
Gordon McKayDivision of Sustainable Development, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, PO Box 34110, Doha, Qatar.
Ahmed AbdalaChemical Engineering Program, Texas A&M University at Qatar, POB 23874, Doha, Qatar.
Hamad bin Khalifa University · QATexas A&M University at Qatar · QA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presence of traces of heavy metals in wastewater causes adverse health effects on humans and the ecosystem. Adsorption is a low cost and eco-friendly method for the removal of low concentrations of heavy metals from wastewater streams. Over the past several years, graphene-based materials have been researched as exceptional adsorbents. In this review, the applications of graphene oxide (GO), reduce graphene oxide (rGO), and graphene-based nanocomposites (GNCs) for the removal of various metals are analyzed. Firstly, the common synthesis routes for GO, rGO, and GNCs are discussed. Secondly, the available literature on the adsorption of heavy metals including arsenic, lead, cadmium, nickel, mercury, chromium and copper using graphene-based materials are reviewed and analyzed. The adsorption isotherms, kinetics, capacity, and removal efficiency for each metal on different graphene materials, as well as the effects of the synthesis method and the adsorption process conditions on the recyclability of the graphene materials, are discussed. Finally, future perspectives and trends in the field are also highlighted.

Indexed as

adsorptiongraphene nanocompositesheavy metalsregeneration

Identifiers

PMID32214007
PMCPMC7153373
OpenAlexW3013371075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.