Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32214003›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Who Benefits from An Intervention Program on Foundational Skills for Handwriting Addressed to Kindergarten Children and First Graders?

Livia Taverna, Marta Tremolada, Liliana Dozza, Renata Zanin Scaratti, Domahs Ulrike, Carlo Lallo, Barbara Tosetto

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05795738 (Effects of Different Visual-perceptual-motor Training Courses on Kindergarten Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05795738 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Different Visual-perceptual-motor Training Courses on Kindergarten Children

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2022 to 2026Enrolled180ConditionsAgraphiaArmsChinese character-based visuomotor training program, traditional visuomotor training program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Livia TavernaFaculty of Education, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39042 Brixen-Bressanone, Italy.
Marta TremoladaDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialization, University of Padua, 35100 Padua, Italy.
Liliana DozzaFaculty of Education, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39042 Brixen-Bressanone, Italy.
Renata Zanin ScarattiFaculty of Education, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, 39042 Brixen-Bressanone, Italy.
Domahs UlrikeInstitute for German Linguistics, University of Marburg, 35032 Marburg, Germany.
Carlo LalloDepartment of Law, University of Roma Tre, 00154 Rome, Italy.
Barbara TosettoMedical School for Health Professions "Claudiana", 39100 Bozen, Italy.
Free University of Bozen-Bolzano · ITRoma Tre University · ITUniversity of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the effectiveness of a 10-wk intervention program based on occupational therapy principles on visual-motor integration skills and fine motor abilities in kindergartners and first graders. We recruited 55 students tested three times with the Visual-Motor Integration Test (VMI) and Movement Assessment Battery for Children-2 (MABC-2): before the intervention (T1), post-intervention (T2) and one month later (T3). Research findings: Significant improvements were found on VMI between T1 and T2, particularly for kindergartners. Neither group of children demonstrated changes on manual dexterity scores. The present study showed that the intervention program led to different changes in the at-risk of motor impairment group than in the not at-risk children. Results indicated that games and stimulation activities helped children below the 16th percentile over time in the manual dexterity domain. A gender effect was observed, with female children increasing their abilities over time more than male peers. Future research should concentrate on stimulating fine motor skills in hand manipulation and test how these abilities influence graphomotor skills and handwriting over time. Finally, more research is needed to determine the impact of activities and games carried out in educational settings.

Indexed as

Early Intervention, EducationalHandwritingMotor SkillsOccupational TherapyPsychomotor PerformanceChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleSchoolsfine motor skillsintervention programs in educational settingvisual-motor integration

Identifiers

PMID32214003
PMCPMC7142437
OpenAlexW3013603420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.