Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32213890›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

How to Educate Pregnant Women about Endocrine Disruptors?

Steeve Rouillon, Houria El Ouazzani, Jean-Benoit Hardouin, Line Enjalbert, Sylvie Rabouan, Virginie Migeot, Marion Albouy-Llaty

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07461857 (Minority-focused Environmental Health Education and Tracking), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07461857 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Minority-focused Environmental Health Education and Tracking (MEET) Pilot Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMillion Marker Wellness, Inc.Ran2025 to 2026Enrolled151ConditionsEnvironmental ExposureArmsEducation curriculum
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Knowledge and attitudes of pregnant women about endocrine disruptors.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Potential Risks and Factors of Women's Health Promotion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steeve RouillonHealth-Endocrine Disruptors-EXposome (HEDEX), INSERM-CIC1402, University Hospital of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Houria El OuazzaniHealth-Endocrine Disruptors-EXposome (HEDEX), INSERM-CIC1402, University Hospital of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Jean-Benoit HardouinUMR SPHERE, Nantes, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Line EnjalbertUMR SPHERE, Nantes, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Sylvie RabouanHealth-Endocrine Disruptors-EXposome (HEDEX), INSERM-CIC1402, University Hospital of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Virginie MigeotHealth-Endocrine Disruptors-EXposome (HEDEX), INSERM-CIC1402, University Hospital of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.
Marion Albouy-LlatyHealth-Endocrine Disruptors-EXposome (HEDEX), INSERM-CIC1402, University Hospital of Poitiers, 86000 Poitiers, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0586-5620

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Patient Education as TopicEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental PollutantsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPregnancyPregnant PeoplePrenatal CareQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental Pollutantseducational postureendocrine disruptorhealth educationpregnant women

Identifiers

PMID32213890
PMCPMC7143617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.