ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Delayed Reconstruction of Palatomaxillary Defect Using Fibula Free Flap.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of Cross-Linked Collagen Membranes for Bone Regeneration: In Vitro and Clinical Studies.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Titanium mesh and pedicled buccal fat pad for the reconstruction of maxillary defect: case report.Maxillofacial plastic and reconstructive surgery · 2021Article
- Application of additive manufacturing in customized titanium mandibular implants for patients with oral tumors.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- 3D-Printed Ceramic Bone Scaffolds with Variable Pore Architectures.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Correction: Byun, S.-H. et al. Delayed Reconstruction of Palatomaxillary Defect Using Fibula Free Flap.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- Detrimental Effect of Sitagliptin Induced Autophagy on Multiterritory Perforator Flap Survival.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe objective of this study was to evaluate a surgical technique and to present the results of delayed reconstruction of palatomaxillary defects using fibula free flap (FFF).
methodsA review was conducted for nine patients who underwent palatomaxillary reconstruction using FFF. Primary disease, type of reconstruction, defect area, fibula segment length and number of osteotomies, radiotherapy, and implant installation after FFF reconstruction were analyzed.
resultsAll nine patients underwent delayed reconstruction. The fibula shaft was osteotomized into two segments in seven patients and three segments in one patient with bilateral Brown's revised classification IV/d defect. One case was planned by using a computer-aided design computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) system with a navigation system. The mean length of the grafted fibula bone was 68.06 mm. Dental implant treatment was performed in six patients. Six patients received radiation therapy, and there were no specific complications related to the radiation therapy. In one case, the defect was reconstructed with FFF flow-through from a radial forearm free flap.
conclusionThis clinical study demonstrated that the fibula flap is an ideal donor-free flap in a palatomaxillary defect. Delayed reconstruction using an FFF can reduce the complication and failure rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.