Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32213673›Full record

ArticleJournal of neural engineering2020

Influence of systematic variations of the stimulation profile on responses evoked with a vestibular implant prototype in humans.

Céline Crétallaz, Anissa Boutabla, Samuel Cavuscens, Maurizio Ranieri, T A Khoa Nguyen, Herman Kingma, Raymond Van De Berg, Nils Guinand, Angélica Pérez Fornos

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04918745 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

VertiGO! - Get up and GO! With the Vestibular Implant

TypeinterventionalSponsorMaastricht University Medical CenterRan2021 to 2029Enrolled13ConditionsBilateral Vestibular LossArmsCochlear Vestibular Implant (CVI)
NCT05246553 naunknown statusnot on this map

Electrical Stimulation of the Peripheral Vestibular System in Order to Develop a Vestibular Implant

TypeinterventionalSponsorNils GuinandRan2011 to 2023Enrolled52ConditionsVestibular Disorder, Bilateral Vestibulopathy, Bilateral Vestibular LossArmsElectrical stimulation of the vestibular system, Electrical stimulation of the auditory system, Bilateral vestibulopathy Patients (BV), Unilateral vestibulopathy Patients (UV)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Vestibular prosthesis: from basic research to clinics.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Céline CrétallazDivision of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Anissa Boutabla
Samuel Cavuscens
Maurizio Ranieri
T A Khoa Nguyen
Herman Kingma
Raymond Van De Berg
Nils Guinand
Angélica Pérez Fornos
University of Geneva · CHNational Research Tomsk State University · RUUniversity Hospital of Bern · CH

Funding

Temporal Synthesis of Vestibular and Extra-Vestibular Sensory SignalsR01DC017425 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI HULLAR, TIMOTHY E, LEWIS, RICHARD F · 2019 to 2023
$2.7M
Vestibular Implants Tested in Human SubjectsR56DC016924 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI LEWIS, RICHARD F · 2019 to 2019
$177k
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017425NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC016924RRD VA I50 RX002361
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore the impact of different electrical stimulation profiles in human recipients of the Geneva-Maastricht vestibular implant prototypes. APPROACH: Four implanted patients were recruited for this study. We investigated the relative efficacy of systematic variations of the electrical stimulus profile (phase duration, pulse rate, baseline level, modulation depth) in evoking vestibulo-ocular (eVOR) and perceptual responses. MAIN

resultsShorter phase durations and, to a lesser extent, slower pulse rates allowed maximizing the electrical dynamic range available for eliciting a wider range of intensities of vestibular percepts. When either the phase duration or the pulse rate was held constant, current modulation depth was the factor that had the most significant impact on peak velocity of the eVOR. SIGNIFICANCE: Our results identified important parametric variations that influence the measured responses. Furthermore, we observed that not all vestibular pathways seem equally sensitive to the electrical stimulus when the electrodes are placed in the semicircular canals and monopolar stimulation is used. This opens the door to evaluating new stimulation strategies for a vestibular implant, and suggests the possibility of selectively activating one vestibular pathway or the other in order to optimize rehabilitation outcomes.

Indexed as

Reflex, Vestibulo-OcularVestibule, LabyrinthElectric StimulationHumansProstheses and ImplantsSemicircular Canals

Identifiers

PMID32213673
PMCPMC8630998
OpenAlexW3013867136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.