Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32213582›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Upcycling chitin-containing waste into organonitrogen chemicals via an integrated process.

Xiaoqiang Ma, Gökalp Gözaydın, Huiying Yang, Wenbo Ning, Xi Han, Nga Yu Poon, Hong Liang, Ning Yan, Kang Zhou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Blended nexus molecules promote COScience advances · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Cloning and Characterization of Chitin Deacetylase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoqiang MaDisruptive & Sustainable Technologies for Agricultural Precision, Singapore-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore 138602, Singapore.
Gökalp GözaydınDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117585, Singapore.
Huiying YangDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117585, Singapore.
Wenbo NingDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117585, Singapore.
Xi HanDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117585, Singapore.
Nga Yu PoonDisruptive & Sustainable Technologies for Agricultural Precision, Singapore-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore 138602, Singapore.
Hong LiangDisruptive & Sustainable Technologies for Agricultural Precision, Singapore-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore 138602, Singapore.
Ning YanDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117585, Singapore ning.yan@nus.edu.sg kang.zhou@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0002-1877-9206
Kang ZhouDisruptive & Sustainable Technologies for Agricultural Precision, Singapore-Massachusetts Institute of Technology Alliance for Research and Technology, Singapore 138602, Singapore; ning.yan@nus.edu.sg kang.zhou@nus.edu.sg.ORCID 0000-0003-0606-7030
National University of Singapore · SGSingapore-MIT Alliance for Research and Technology · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chitin is the most abundant renewable nitrogenous material on earth and is accessible to humans in the form of crustacean shell waste. Such waste has been severely underutilized, resulting in both resource wastage and disposal issues. Upcycling chitin-containing waste into value-added products is an attractive solution. However, the direct conversion of crustacean shell waste-derived chitin into a wide spectrum of nitrogen-containing chemicals (NCCs) is challenging via conventional catalytic processes. To address this challenge, in this study, we developed an integrated biorefinery process to upgrade shell waste-derived chitin into two aromatic NCCs that currently cannot be synthesized from chitin via any chemical process (tyrosine and l-DOPA). The process involves a pretreatment of chitin-containing shell waste and an enzymatic/fermentative bioprocess using metabolically engineered

Indexed as

AcetylglucosamineAnimalsCarbonChitinChitosanCrustaceaEscherichia coliGenetic EngineeringGlucoseHydrolysisLevodopaMineralsNitrogenPolymerizationTyrosineWaste ProductsAcetylglucosamineCarbonChitinChitosanGlucoseLevodopaMineralsNitrogenTyrosineWaste Productswater soluble chitinchitinintegrated processmetabolic engineeringrenewable nitrogenous materialshrimp shell waste

Identifiers

PMID32213582
PMCPMC7149430
OpenAlexW3013020023

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.