Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32213514›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2020

Impact of the test and treat policy on delays in antiretroviral therapy initiation among adult HIV positive patients from six clinics in Johannesburg, South Africa: results from a prospective cohort study.

Dorina Onoya, Tembeka Sineke, Cheryl Hendrickson, Idah Mokhele, Mhairi Maskew, Lawrence C Long, Matthew Fox

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorina OnoyaHealth Economics & Epidemiology Research Office, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa donoya@heroza.org.ORCID 0000-0002-2664-7342
Tembeka SinekeHealth Economics & Epidemiology Research Office, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Cheryl HendricksonHealth Economics & Epidemiology Research Office, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-2744-5208
Idah MokheleHealth Economics & Epidemiology Research Office, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Mhairi MaskewHealth Economics & Epidemiology Research Office, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Lawrence C LongHealth Economics & Epidemiology Research Office, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Matthew FoxHealth Economics & Epidemiology Research Office, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
University of the Witwatersrand · ZABoston University · US

Funding

PEPFAR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess delays to antiretroviral therapy (ART) initiation before and after the Universal Test and Treat (UTT) and the same-day initiation (SDI) of ART policy periods in Johannesburg, South Africa.

designProspective cohort study.

settingPatients were recruited from six primary health clinics in Johannesburg.

participantsOverall, 1029 newly diagnosed HIV positive adults (≥18 years) were consecutively enrolled by referral from the testing counsellor between April and December 2015 (pre-UTT n=146), July and August 2017 (UTT, n=141) and October 2017 and August 2018 (SDI, n=742).

main outcome measuresCox proportional hazards regression was used to assess predictors of 30 days ART initiation. Additionally, predictors of immediate ART initiation were evaluated using Poisson regression.

resultsOverall, 30 days ART proportions were 71.9% overall, 36.9% pre-UTT (44.3% of those eligible), 65.9% under UTT and 79.9% under the SDI policy. The median days to ART initiation declined from 21 pre-UTT (IQR: 15-30) to 8 (IQR: 6-16) under UTT and 5 days (IQR: 0-8) under the SDI policy. However, only 150 (20.2%) of the SDI cohort-initiated ART immediately after HIV diagnosis. Living in a two-adult home (adjusted HR (aHR) 1.2 vs living alone, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.5) increased the likelihood of 30-day ART. Missing baseline cluster of differentiation four (CD4) data decreased the likelihood of 30 days ART by 40% (aHR 0.6 vs CD4 <350 cells/µL, 95% CI 0.5 to 0.7). More women took up immediate ART (adjusted relative risk (aRR) 1.3, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.9). Participants ≥40 years (aRR 0.6 vs 18-24 years, 95% CI 0.4 to 0.9) were less likely to start ART immediately after HIV diagnosis. However, immediate ART rates increased with longer policy implementation time (aRR 0.2 for <3 months vs >10 months, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.4).

conclusionsThe study results highlight a positive move towards earlier ART initiation during the UTT and SDI periods and emphasise a need to increase same-day ART implementation further.

Indexed as

Health PolicyAdolescentAdultAnti-HIV AgentsAntiretroviral Therapy, Highly ActiveFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrimary Health CareProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesSouth AfricaTime-to-TreatmentAnti-HIV Agentshealth policyHIV & AIDSprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID32213514
PMCPMC7170559
OpenAlexW3013314841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.