Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32213468›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical Internet research2020

Risks and Benefits of Web-Based Patient Narratives: Systematic Review.

Daniel Drewniak, Andrea Glässel, Martina Hodel, Nikola Biller-Andorno

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07280325 (Moxie), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07280325 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Moxie: A Self-management Education and Support Program Using Advertising Principles to Reduce Rehospitalization for Cardiovascular-related Illnesses

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of CalgaryRan2026 to 2029Enrolled9,000ConditionsChronic Kidney Disease, Diabetes (DM), Heart Disease, StrokeArmsMoxie SMES Letters, Facilitated Relay Letter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. YouTube as a Source of Patient Information for Malignant and Benign Primary Bone Tumors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluating YouTube as a source of information on hemifacial spasm.Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cancer survival stories: Perception, creation, and potential use case.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniel DrewniakInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5728-0339
Andrea GlässelInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9199-3604
Martina HodelInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1547-472X
Nikola Biller-AndornoInstitute of Biomedical Ethics and History of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7661-1324
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient narratives are illustrative, individual accounts of patients' experiences with certain health conditions. Web-based patient narratives have become widely available on the internet and in social media, as part of electronically available patient decision aids or Web-based databases. In recent years, the role of patient narratives as a source of information, insight, and support for both health care users and providers has increasingly been emphasized. Although the potential impact of patient stories has high immediate plausibility, it is of interest to know if this impact can be captured in quantitative studies.

objectiveThis review aimed to evaluate whether research-generated Web-based patient narratives have quantifiable risks or benefits for (potential) patients, relatives, or health care professionals.

methodsWe searched the following databases from August 2017 to March 2019: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, PsycInfo, Sociological Abstracts, Web of Science, and EMBASE. Titles and abstracts of the retrieved studies were reviewed and assessed for the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Papers were included if they studied the following: (1) (potential) patients, relatives, or health care professionals; (2) the effects of Web-based patient narratives that were generated scientifically (eg, through qualitative research methods); and (3) were quantitative studies. Furthermore, 2 authors independently performed an assessment of the quality of the included studies using a validated checklist.

resultsOf 4226 documents, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies investigated 10 different sources of Web-based patient narratives. Sample sizes ranged from 23 to 2458. The mean score of the quality assessment was 82.6 (range 61-100). Effects regarding five different purposes were identified as follows: provide information, engage, model behavior, persuade, and comfort. We found positive effects in every category and negative effects in one category (persuade). Several of the reported effects are rather small or were identified under specific experimental conditions.

conclusionsPatient narratives seem to be a promising means to support users in improving their understanding of certain health conditions and possibly to provide emotional support and have an impact on behavioral changes. There is limited evidence for beneficial effects on some outcomes. However, narratives are characterized by considerable heterogeneity and the investigated outcomes are hardly comparable with each other, which makes the overall judgment difficult. As there are numerous possible measures and purposes of narratives, quantifying the impact of Web-based patient narratives remains a challenge. Future research is needed to define the optimal standards for quantitative approaches to narrative-based interventions.

Indexed as

HumansInternetOutcome Assessment, Health CareRisk Assessmentpatient experiencespersonal narratives as topicsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID32213468
PMCPMC7146251
OpenAlexW3013322000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.