Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32213317›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2020

Image analysis and artificial intelligence in infectious disease diagnostics.

K P Smith, J E Kirby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Advances in the Application of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Microbiological Testing].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. What's not to learn? AI meets parasitology.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Validation of Vetscan ImagystParasites & vectors · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

K P SmithDepartment of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
J E KirbyDepartment of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: jekirby@bidmc.harvard.edu.

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
Identification and Characterization of Novel Antimicrobial Adjunctives to Restore Susceptibility to Carbapenem Resistant EnterobacteriaceaeF32AI124590 · NIAID · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, KENNETH PATRICK · 2017 to 2019
$175k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI124590
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrobiologists are valued for their time-honed skills in image analysis, including identification of pathogens and inflammatory context in Gram stains, ova and parasite preparations, blood smears and histopathologic slides. They also must classify colony growth on a variety of agar plates for triage and assessment. Recent advances in image analysis, in particular application of artificial intelligence (AI), have the potential to automate these processes and support more timely and accurate diagnoses.

objectivesTo review current AI-based image analysis as applied to clinical microbiology; and to discuss future trends in the field. SOURCES: Material sourced for this review included peer-reviewed literature annotated in the PubMed or Google Scholar databases and preprint articles from bioRxiv. Articles describing use of AI for analysis of images used in infectious disease diagnostics were reviewed. CONTENT: We describe application of machine learning towards analysis of different types of microbiologic image data. Specifically, we outline progress in smear and plate interpretation as well as the potential for AI diagnostic applications in the clinical microbiology laboratory. IMPLICATIONS: Combined with automation, we predict that AI algorithms will be used in the future to prescreen and preclassify image data, thereby increasing productivity and enabling more accurate diagnoses through collaboration between the AI and the microbiologist. Once developed, image-based AI analysis is inexpensive and amenable to local and remote diagnostic use.

Indexed as

Machine LearningAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceAutomation, LaboratoryCommunicable DiseasesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedArtificiall intelligenceDeep learningGram stainMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID32213317
PMCPMC7508855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.