ArticleCanadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada2020
Exploring the patterns of practice and satisfaction among female urologists in Canada.
Article in Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The ascent of females in Canadian urology: Times they are a-changin'.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Article
- Identifying factors influencing specialty choice in urology by female medical students.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026Article
- Change is on the horizon.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2025Article
- Gender disparity within the Canadian Urological Association A comparison with the Quebec Urological Association.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024Article
- Women as Urologists in Saudi Arabia: Career Choice and Practice Challenges: A Comparative Cross-Sectional Study.Research and reports in urology · 2023Article
- Burnout in Canadian urology: Cohort analysis from the 2018 Canadian Urological Association census.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021Review
- *To self* Don't write a COVID editorial. Do not write another COVID editorial.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionOur aim was to explore the satisfaction, personal and professional challenges, and practice barriers among female urologists in Canada.
methodsA literature review was completed to design our survey. Trends with respect to career and personal satisfaction were identified, including academic advancement, mentorship, professional challenges, workplace discrimination, family satisfaction, and remuneration, among others. These key themes were formatted into 44 questions, translated into French, and distributed electronically as a survey to 80 female urology staff across Canada.
resultsSixty (75.0%) women completed the survey. Many had been in practice <5 years (44.1%) and 72.9% completed a fellowship. Overall, 96.6% of women were very or somewhat satisfied with their career. Seeing more time-consuming patients and financial constraints within the healthcare system were the greatest source of dissatisfaction. Two-thirds of respondents reported that they received significant mentorship and 40% found it difficult to find a mentor during their training. Overall, 65.0% experienced gender discrimination, most commonly from a colleague or a patient. Women who practiced in the community were more likely to report experiencing discrimination compared to women practicing in an academic setting (78.1% vs. 51.9%; p=0.034). Mean time for maternity leave was 17.1 (±8.3) weeks, and 30.2% reported a pregnancy-related complication triggered by their work. Overall, 66.1% would choose urology again.
conclusionsIt is important to advocate for the wellness of female urologists. To accomplish this, we need to address the challenges revealed in the survey, including supporting women on maternity leave, improving mentorship, and prioritizing female urology leadership initiatives. We have established a formal circle of support within the urology community in Canada to achieve these goals.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.