Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32213172›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2020

Psychometric properties of the Czech Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale: reliability and content validity analysis.

Karolina Vlckova, Eva Hoschlova, Eva Chroustova, Martin Loucka

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Karolina VlckovaCenter for Palliative Care, Dykova 15, 110 00, Prague, Czech Republic. k.vlckova@paliativnicentrum.cz.
Eva HoschlovaFaculty of Arts, Department of Psychology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Eva ChroustovaFaculty of Arts, Department of Psychology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
Martin LouckaCenter for Palliative Care, Dykova 15, 110 00, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

Grantová Agentura České Republiky no. 17-26722Y
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOutcome measurement is an essential part of the evaluation of palliative care and the measurements need to be reliable, valid and adapted to the culture in which they are used. The Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale (IPOS) is a widely used tool for assessing personal-level outcomes in palliative care. The aim of this study was to provide Czech version of IPOS and assess its psychometric properties.

methodsPatients receiving palliative care in hospice or hospitals completed the IPOS. The reliability of Czech IPOS was tested with Cronbach alpha (for internal consistency), the intraclass correlation coefficient for total IPOS score and weighted Kappa (for test-retest reliability of individual items). Factor analysis was used for elucidating the construct (Exploratory Factor Analysis). Convergent validity was tested with correlation analysis (Spearman correlation) in a part of the sample, who completed also the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS).

resultsThe sample consisted of 140 patients (mean age 72; 90 women; 81% oncological disease). The Cronbach alpha was 0.789; intraclass correlation was 0.88. The correlations of IPOS with ESAS was R = 0.4 and PPS R = - 0.2. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a 2-factor solution on our data. The first factor covers emotional and information needs and the second factor covers physical symptoms.

conclusionCzech IPOS has very good reliability regarding both internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Together with an item analysis results, we can conclude that the Czech adaptation of the tool was successful. The convergent validity needs to be assessed on the larger sample and the proposed 2-factor internal structure of the questionnaire has to be confirmed by using CFA.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCzech RepublicFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePalliative CarePsychometricsQuality of LifeReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesIPOSOutcome measurementPalliative carePatient-reported outcome measurePsychometricsReliabilitySymptom assessmentValidity

Identifiers

PMID32213172
PMCPMC7098098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.