Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32213164›Full record

Observational studyBMC family practice2020

Management in primary care at the time of a suicide attempt and its impact on care post-suicide attempt: an observational study in the French GP sentinel surveillance system.

Nadia Younes, Mathieu Rivière, Frédéric Urbain, Romain Pons, Thomas Hanslik, Louise Rossignol, Christine Chan Chee, Thierry Blanchon

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nadia YounesEA 40-47 Université Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, F-78047, Guyancourt, France. nyounes@ch-versailles.fr.
Mathieu RivièreSorbonne Université, INSERM, Pierre Louise Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, F-75013, Paris, France.
Frédéric UrbainUniversité Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France.
Romain PonsSorbonne Université, INSERM, Pierre Louise Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, F-75013, Paris, France.
Thomas HanslikSorbonne Université, INSERM, Pierre Louise Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, F-75013, Paris, France.
Louise RossignolSorbonne Université, INSERM, Pierre Louise Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, F-75013, Paris, France.
Christine Chan CheeFrench Institute for Public Health Surveillance, Saint Maurice, France.
Thierry BlanchonSorbonne Université, INSERM, Pierre Louise Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, F-75013, Paris, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to describe primary care management at the time of a suicide attempt (SA) and after the SA.

methodsAn observational (cross-sectional) study was conducted among 166 sentinel GPs within France (a non-gatekeeping country) between 2013 and 2017 for all GP's patients who attempted suicide. MEASUREMENTS: frequency of patients 1) managed by the GP at the time of the SA, 2) addressed to an emergency department (ED), 3) without care at the time of the SA, and 4) managed by the GP after the SA and factors associated with GP management at the time of and after the SA.

resultsThree hundred twenty-one SAs were reported, of which N = 95 (29.6%) were managed by the GP at the time of the SA, N = (70.5%) were referred to an ED, and N = (27.4%) remained at home. Forty-eight (14.9%) patients did not receive any care at the time of the SA and 178 (55.4%) were managed directly by an ED. GPs were more likely to be involved in management of the patient at the time of the SA if they were younger (39.2% for patients < 34 years old; 22.9% for those 35 to 54 years old, and 30.3% for those more than 55 years old p = 0.02) or the SA involved a firearm or self-cutting (51.9%) versus those involving drugs (23.7%); p = 0.006). After the SA, GPs managed 174 patients (54.2%), more often (60%) when they provided care at home at the time of the SA, p = 0.04; 1.87 [1.07; 3.35]. No other factor was associated with management by GPs after the SA.

conclusionsThe study faced limitations: data were not available for patients managed solely by specialists during their SA and results may not be generalisable to countries with a stronger gatekeeping system. We concluded that GPs are involved in the management of patients at the time of a SA for a third of patients. EDs are the major provider of care at that time. Half patients consulted GPs after the SA and connections between GPs and ED upon discharge should be improved.

Indexed as

General PractitionersInterdisciplinary CommunicationPatient Care ManagementPrimary Health CareSuicide, AttemptedAdultContinuity of Patient CareEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFranceHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeeds AssessmentPhysician's RoleQuality ImprovementGeneral practiceManagement of the suicide attemptPost-suicide attempt careSuicide attemptsSuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID32213164
PMCPMC7098086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.