ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2020
Integrated analysis of miRNA and mRNA expression profiles in p53-edited PFF cells.
Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A decade of scientific advancements and collaborations on CRISPR-Cas9 application in cancer research: a bibliometric review.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive review of CRISPR-based gene editing: mechanisms, challenges, and applications in cancer therapy.Molecular cancer · 2024Review
- Article
- REIA: A database for cancer A-to-I RNA editing with interactive analysis.International journal of biological sciences · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
p53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancers, with over half of all tumors harboring mutation at this locus. R248 and R249 (corresponding to porcine R241 and R242), are among the hotspot mutations frequently mutated in liver, lung, breast, and some other cancers. In this study, p53 gene was knocked out or point-edited (R241 and R242 were converted to 241W and 242S) in porcine fetal fibroblast (PFF) cells via CRISPR-Cas9 technique. High throughput sequencing of miRNA and mRNA uncovered a total of 225 differentially expressed miRNAs (DEMs) and 738 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the p53 knockout (p53-KO) cells, and a total of 211 DEMs and 722 DEGs in the point-modified (p53-241W242S) cells. Totally 28 annotated DEMs were found to overlap between p53-KO/p53-WT and p53-241W242S/p53-WT miRNAs datasets, of which miR-34 c, miR-218, miR-205, miR-105-1, miR-105-2, miR-206, miR-224 and miR-429 play important roles in p53 regulatory network. Among the top 10 DEGs in p53-KO and p53-241W242S cells, most genes were reported to be involved in tumors, cell proliferation or cell migration. p53-KO and p53-241W242S cells showed a significantly higher (P < 0.01) proliferation rate compared with p53-WT cells. In conclusion, genetic modifications of p53 gene significantly affect the expression levels of a large number of genes and miRNAs in the PFF cells. The p53-edited PFF cells could be used as non-tumor cell models for investigating the p53 signaling network, and as donor cells for somatic nuclear transfer, with the aim to develop porcine models with the corresponding p53 mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.