ArticleUnited European gastroenterology journal2020
Towards an EU-wide suitable regulatory framework for faecally derived, industrially manufactured medicinal products.
Article in United European gastroenterology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gut microbiota as modulators of obesity and overweight: a registry-based systematic review of clinical trial evidence.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Fecal microbiota transplantation: a tale of two regulatory pathways.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- The ladder of regulatory stringency and balance: an application to the US FDA's regulation of bacterial live therapeutics.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- The regulatory framework for microbiome-based therapies: insights into European regulatory developments.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2025Review
- Plumping up a Cushion of Human Biowaste in Regenerative Medicine: Novel Insights into a State-of-the-Art Reserve Arsenal.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Review
- The Regulatory Approach for Faecal Microbiota Transplantation as Treatment forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Comment on
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.