Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32213017›Full record

ReviewUnited European gastroenterology journal2020

Review of the diagnosis and management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

Stefano Crippa, Paolo G Arcidiacono, Francesco De Cobelli, Massimo Falconi

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
In one paragraph

Review in United European gastroenterology journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Clinical and Molecular Attributes and Evaluation of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasm.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Stefano CrippaDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Paolo G ArcidiaconoDivision of Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and EUS, Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco De CobelliDepartment of Radiology, Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Massimo FalconiDivision of Pancreatic Surgery, Vita e Salute University, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms are common lesions with the potential of harbouring/developing a pancreatic cancer. An accurate evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms with high-resolution imaging techniques and endoscopic ultrasound is mandatory in order to identify patients worthy either of surgical treatment or surveillance. In this review, the diagnosis and management of patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms are discussed with a specific focus on current guidelines. Areas of uncertainty are also discussed, as there are controversies related to the optimal indications for surgery, surveillance protocols and surveillance discontinuation.

Indexed as

AgedAsymptomatic DiseasesCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCholangiopancreatography, Magnetic ResonanceDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDisease ProgressionEndosonographyGastroenterologyHumansIncidental FindingsMaleMedical OncologyPancreatectomyPancreatic CystPancreatic DuctsPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsEndoscopic ultrasoundepidemiologypancreaspancreatic cancerscreeningsurgery

Identifiers

PMID32213017
PMCPMC7184662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.