ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2020
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Acceptability of Urine and Cervico-Vaginal Sample Self-Collection for HPV-Based Cervical Cancer Screening.
Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph
Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling among Latinas in the United States: A systematic review.Cancer medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Implementation and acceptability of a community based intervention for cervical cancer screening amongst women of reproductive age in Kiambu County, Kenya.BMC research notes · 2026Article
- Understanding knowledge, beliefs, values and barriers towards cervical cancer screening and self-sampling amongst migrant Muslim women in Southwest London: an in-depth qualitative interview study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- A Narrative Review of Urine-Based Human Papillomavirus Screening: Performance, Challenges, and Opportunities to Expand Access in the United States.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2025Review
- Is South Africa ready for point-of-care, non-sputum tests for TB diagnosis? An assessment of end-user perceptions on a novel urine test and tongue swab for TB testing.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Looking Back, Moving Forward: Challenges and Opportunities for Global Cervical Cancer Prevention and Control.Viruses · 2024Review
- Promise and perils of paper-based point-of-care nucleic acid detection for endemic and pandemic pathogens.Lab on a chip · 2023Review
- Evaluation of Urine and Vaginal Self-Sampling versus Clinician-Based Sampling for Cervical Cancer Screening: A Field Comparison of the Acceptability of Three Sampling Tests in a Rural Community of Cuenca, Ecuador.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Experiences and preferences towards collecting a urine and cervicovaginal self-sample among women attending a colposcopy clinic.Preventive medicine reports · 2022Article
- Prevalence of syphilis and chlamydia trachomatis infection among female sex workers in Jiangsu, China: Results from a multicenter cross-sectional and venue-based study.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Effectiveness and feasibility of self-sampling for human papillomavirus testing for internet-based cervical cancer screening.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Triage of human papillomavirus infected women by methylation analysis in first-void urine.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Impact of Collection Volume and DNA Extraction Method on the Detection of Biomarkers and HPV DNA in First-Void Urine.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Extended HPV Genotyping to Compare HPV Type Distribution in Self- and Provider-Collected Samples for Cervical Cancer Screening.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Eliane RohnerDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
F Hunter McGuireDepartment of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Yutong LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Quefeng LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Kate MieleDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Samveg A DesaiDepartment of Biostatistics, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
John W SchmittDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Andrea KnittelDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Julie A E NelsonDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Claire EdelmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Vijay SivaramanDepartment of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
Anna BakerDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
LaHoma S RomockiDepartment of Public Health Education, North Carolina Central University, Durham, North Carolina.
Lisa RahangdaleDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Jennifer S SmithDepartment of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USDuke University · USNorth Carolina Central University · USUNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center
Funding
Targeting the MEKK2-ERK5 Signaling Node in Triple Negative Breast CancerU54CA156733 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI LINNAN, LAURA A · 2010 to 2020
$9.7MNCI NIH HHS U54 CA156733
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
AdultAgedColposcopyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMass ScreeningMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient PreferencePredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsSelf-Examinationacceptabilitycervical cancer screeningHPV testingself-collectionurine
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390
Registered trials
None linked
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.