Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32212379›Full record

ArticleThoracic cancer2020

Assessment of anxiety and depression in patients with incidental pulmonary nodules and analysis of its related impact factors.

Lihong Li, Yan Zhao, Hui Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Thoracic cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A Novel Theranostic Strategy for Malignant Pulmonary Nodules by Targeted CECAM6 withAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lihong LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4644-9001
Yan ZhaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess anxiety and depression in patients with incidental pulmonary nodules and analyze the related impact factors.

methodsAll patients were assessed by questionnaires for their anxiety and depression after incidentally found pulmonary nodules. Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD), generalized anxiety disorder scale-7 (GAD-7), and multidimensional scale of perceived social support (MSPSS) were used to evaluate their anxiety and depression in order to understand the basic information and social support, and to analyze the related factors.

resultsThe HAD scale was used in 201 patients with pulmonary nodules. Univariate analysis showed the frequency of visits and social support had significant effects on anxiety (χ

conclusionsThe results of the study concluded that anxiety was affected by social support and previous psychological factors, while depression was affected by marital status and social support. Doctors should therefore strengthen communication with patients, and alleviate the negative emotions of patients as far as possible.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAnxietyChinaDepressionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncidental FindingsLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedMultiple Pulmonary NodulesPrognosisSocial SupportSolitary Pulmonary NoduleAnxietydepressionpulmonary nodulesrelevancesocial support

Identifiers

PMID32212379
PMCPMC7262923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.