Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32212342›Full record

Trial reportThe Laryngoscope2020

Nucleus Hybrid S12: Multicenter Clinical Trial Results.

Camille C Dunn, Jacob Oleson, Aaron Parkinson, Marlan R Hansen, Bruce J Gantz

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Laryngoscope, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Patients with Mondini deformty: is standard electrode necessary?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Camille C DunnDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0001-7839-2073
Jacob OlesonDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Aaron ParkinsonCochlear Americas, Centennial, Colorado, U.S.A.
Marlan R HansenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.ORCID 0000-0002-6884-4897
Bruce J GantzDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
University of Iowa · USColorado Center For Hospice and Palliative Care · US

Funding

Speech Production &LanguageP50DC000242 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Bob McMurray · 1989 to 2026
$58.8M
NIDCD NIH HHS P50 DC000242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives/hypothesisThe use of a short 10-mm/10-electrode cochlear implant to preserve low-frequency residual hearing was investigated. This report describes the 12-month outcomes of this multicenter clinical trial. STUDY

designSingle-subject design.

methodsTwenty-eight subjects with low-frequency hearing at or better than 60 dB HL at 500 Hz and severe high-frequency hearing loss were implanted with a Nucleus Hybrid S12 implant in their poorer ear. Speech perception in quiet using Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) words and sentences in noise using AzBio sentences was collected pre- and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months. Subjective reporting using the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) questionnaire was also collected pre- and postoperatively.

resultsFunctional hearing preservation was accomplished in 96% of subjects. At 3 and 6 months, 86% of the 28 subjects had maintained functional hearing. By 12 months, 23 out of 27 subjects (85%) had maintained functional hearing (one subject with functional hearing at 6 months withdrew from the study prior to the 12-month visit). Speech perception results demonstrated that 81% of the participants on CNC words and 77% with AzBio sentences in noise had significant improvements using their everyday listening condition at 12 months compared to preoperative performance with bilateral hearing aids. Furthermore, preoperative to 12 months postoperative subjective ratings showed significant improvements for the SSQ.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates that a high degree of hearing preservation enabling acoustic-electric hearing and improvement in speech understanding in quiet and in noise can be accomplished using a short-electrode 10-mm cochlear implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c Laryngoscope, 130:E548-E558, 2020.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCochlear ImplantationFemaleHearing LossHearing TestsHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited Statescochlear implantHybridresidual hearingshort electrode.

Identifiers

PMID32212342
PMCPMC7728297
OpenAlexW3013958726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.