Trial reportThe Laryngoscope2020
Nucleus Hybrid S12: Multicenter Clinical Trial Results.
Trial report in The Laryngoscope, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Benefits of Cochlear Implantation in Childhood Unilateral Hearing Loss (CUHL Trial).The Laryngoscope · 2022Trial
- Factors Affecting Audiometric and Speech Perception Outcomes in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Recipients.The Laryngoscope · 2026Article
- Patients with Mondini deformty: is standard electrode necessary?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
- Interaural correlation of acoustic hearing preservation following sequential cochlear implantation.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Photografted Zwitterionic Hydrogel Coating Durability for Reduced Foreign Body Response to Cochlear Implants.ACS applied bio materials · 2024Article
- American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force: Recommendations for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Adults.The Laryngoscope · 2024Article
- Conversations in Cochlear Implantation: The Inner Ear Therapy of Today.Biomolecules · 2022Review
- The hearing-impaired patient: what the future holds.Human genetics · 2022Article
- Access and Polarization Electrode Impedance Changes in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Delayed Loss of Acoustic Hearing.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Article
- Residual Hair Cell Responses in Electric-Acoustic Stimulation Cochlear Implant Users with Complete Loss of Acoustic Hearing After Implantation.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectives/hypothesisThe use of a short 10-mm/10-electrode cochlear implant to preserve low-frequency residual hearing was investigated. This report describes the 12-month outcomes of this multicenter clinical trial. STUDY
designSingle-subject design.
methodsTwenty-eight subjects with low-frequency hearing at or better than 60 dB HL at 500 Hz and severe high-frequency hearing loss were implanted with a Nucleus Hybrid S12 implant in their poorer ear. Speech perception in quiet using Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) words and sentences in noise using AzBio sentences was collected pre- and postoperatively at 3, 6, and 12 months. Subjective reporting using the Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) questionnaire was also collected pre- and postoperatively.
resultsFunctional hearing preservation was accomplished in 96% of subjects. At 3 and 6 months, 86% of the 28 subjects had maintained functional hearing. By 12 months, 23 out of 27 subjects (85%) had maintained functional hearing (one subject with functional hearing at 6 months withdrew from the study prior to the 12-month visit). Speech perception results demonstrated that 81% of the participants on CNC words and 77% with AzBio sentences in noise had significant improvements using their everyday listening condition at 12 months compared to preoperative performance with bilateral hearing aids. Furthermore, preoperative to 12 months postoperative subjective ratings showed significant improvements for the SSQ.
conclusionsThis study demonstrates that a high degree of hearing preservation enabling acoustic-electric hearing and improvement in speech understanding in quiet and in noise can be accomplished using a short-electrode 10-mm cochlear implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c Laryngoscope, 130:E548-E558, 2020.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.