Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32212262›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2020

Treatment patterns and outcomes in pancreatic cancer: Retrospective claims analysis.

Yunes Doleh, Lincy S Lal, Cori Blauer-Petersen, Giovanni Antico, Michael Pishvaian

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Improving outcomes of patients with pancreatic cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yunes DolehAstraZeneca US, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Lincy S LalOptum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9123-2434
Cori Blauer-PetersenOptum, Eden Prairie, MN, USA.
Giovanni AnticoAstraZeneca US, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Michael PishvaianNCR Kimmel Cancer Center, Sibley Memorial Hospital and Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
AstraZeneca (Netherlands) · NLOptum (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic cancer represents the third leading cause of US cancer deaths, with median survival <1 year. The goal of this study was to describe systemic treatments, healthcare utilization and costs, and overall survival among patients with unresectable/metastatic disease.

methodsThis study used healthcare claims for commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (at index date) during January 01 2010 to 31 May 2017. Included patients were aged ≥18 years, with continuous 6-month preindex enrollment. Patients were excluded by resectable disease, another primary cancer, or pregnancy. Cohorts were based on first-line (LOT1) chemotherapy regimen.

resultsOverall, 12 978 patients (mean age 70 years, 51% male) were included, among which 5610 (43%) received chemotherapy. Of those, 23% received gemcitabine monotherapy, 22% gemcitabine-nab paclitaxel, 22% FOLFIRINOX, 3% FOLFOX, and 29% received other regimens. Mean LOT1 duration was 112 days; 60% did not undergo subsequent lines of therapy. Moreover, 50% of patients had an emergency room visit and 45% were hospitalized during LOT1. Among treated and untreated patients, mean total 6-month costs were $52 101. We found that patients receiving FOLFIRINOX had the highest costs, whereas those who received gemcitabine monotherapy had the lowest. Median overall survival (mOS) was 335 days with any first-line treatment. FOLFIRINOX-treated patients had the highest mOS (492 days), whereas gemcitabine monotherapy-treated patients had the lowest (223 days).

conclusionsA large proportion (57%) of patients with unresectable/metastatic pancreatic cancer did not receive chemotherapy. Healthcare costs were higher for fluorouracil-based regimens, while lower for gemcitabine-based regimens. Survival rates were within expectations for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAgedAged, 80 and overAlbuminsAmbulatory CareAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalDeoxycytidineDuration of TherapyEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleFluorouracilGemcitabineHospitalizationHumansInsurance, Health130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsDeoxycytidineFluorouracilfolfirinoxGemcitabineIrinotecanLeucovorinOrganoplatinum CompoundsOxaliplatinPaclitaxelcancer survivalhealthcare costshealthcare utilizationpancreatic cancerretrospective study

Identifiers

PMID32212262
PMCPMC7221424
OpenAlexW3013409536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.