Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32212094›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2020

Impact of Hospitalist Team Structure on Patient-Reported Satisfaction with Physician Performance.

Katie L Lappé, Sonja E Raaum, Claire E Ciarkowski, Santosh P Reddy, Stacy A Johnson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katie L LappéDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine & George E. Whalen VA Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA. Katie.lappe@hsc.utah.edu.
Sonja E RaaumDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine & George E. Whalen VA Hospital, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Claire E CiarkowskiDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Santosh P ReddyDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Stacy A JohnsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
University of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient experience is valuable because it reflects how patients perceive the care they receive within the healthcare system and is associated with clinical outcomes. Also, as part of the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (HVBP) program, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) rewards hospitals with financial incentives for patient experience as measured by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey. It is unclear how the addition of residents and advanced practice clinicians (APCs) to hospitalist-led inpatient teams affects patient satisfaction as measured by the HCAHPS and Press Ganey survey.

objectiveTo compare patient satisfaction with hospitalists on resident, APC, and solo hospitalist teams measured by HCAHPS and Press Ganey physician performance domain survey results.

designRetrospective observational cohort study.

participantsAll patients discharged from the Internal Medicine inpatient service between July 1, 2015, and July 1, 2018, who met HCAHPS survey eligibility criteria and completed a patient experience survey. MAIN MEASURES: HCAHPS and Press Ganey physician performance domain survey results. KEY

resultsNo differences were observed in the selection of "top box" scores on the HCAHPS physician performance domain between resident, APC, and solo hospitalist teams. Adjusted Press Ganey physician performance domain survey results demonstrated significant differences between solo hospitalist and resident teams, with solo hospitalists having higher scores in three areas: time physician spent with you (4.58 vs. 4.38, p = 0.050); physician kept you informed (4.63 vs. 4.43, p = 0.047); and physician skill (4.80 vs. 4.63, p = 0.027). Solo hospitalists were perceived to have higher physician skill in comparison with hospitalist-APC teams (4.80 vs. 4.69, p = 0.042).

conclusionWhile Press Ganey survey results suggest that patients have greater satisfaction with physicians on solo hospitalist teams, these differences were not observed on the HCAHPS physician performance survey domain, suggesting physician team structure does not impact HVBP incentive payments by CMS.

Indexed as

HospitalistsAgedHumansMedicarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesHCAHPShospitalistpatient satisfactionPress Ganeyteam structure

Identifiers

PMID32212094
PMCPMC7459007
OpenAlexW3013128826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.