Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32212093›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2020

Trends in Wait Time for Outpatient Colonoscopy in the Veterans Health Administration, 2008-2015.

Megan A Adams, Joel H Rubenstein, Rachel Lipson, Robert G Holleman, Sameer D Saini

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Megan A AdamsCenter for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. meganada@med.umich.edu.
Joel H RubensteinCenter for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Rachel LipsonCenter for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Robert G HollemanCenter for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sameer D SainiCenter for Clinical Management Research, Department of Veterans Affairs, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Veterans Health Administration (VA) recently has been scrutinized for prolonged wait times for routine medical care, including elective outpatient procedures such as colonoscopy. Wait times for colonoscopy following positive fecal occult blood test (FOBT) are associated with worse clinical outcomes only if greater than 6 months.

objectiveWe aimed to investigate time trends in wait time for outpatient colonoscopy in VA and factors influencing wait time.

designRetrospective cohort study using mixed-effects regression of VA administrative data from the Corporate Data Warehouse.

participantsVeterans who underwent outpatient colonoscopy for positive FOBT in 2008-2015 at 124 VA endoscopy facilities. MAIN MEASURES: The main outcome measure was wait time (in days) between positive FOBT and colonoscopy completion, stratified by year and adjusted for sedation type, year, and potentially influential patient- and facility-level factors. KEY

resultsIn total, 125,866 outpatient colonoscopy encounters for positive FOBT occurred during the study period. The number of colonoscopies for this indication declined slightly over time (17,586 in 2008 vs. 13,245 in 2015; range 13,425-19,814). In 2008, median wait time across sites was 50 days (interquartile range [IQR] = 33, 75). There was no secular trend in wait times (2015 median = 52 days, IQR = 34, 77). Examining the adjusted effect of patient- and facility-level factors on wait time, no clinically meaningful difference was found.

conclusionsWait times for colonoscopy for positive FOBT have been stable over time. Despite the perception of prolonged VA wait times, wait times for outpatient colonoscopy for positive FOBT are well below the threshold at which clinically meaningful differences in patient outcomes have been observed.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsVeteransColonoscopyHumansMass ScreeningOccult BloodOutpatientsRetrospective StudiesVeterans HealthWaiting Listsaccesscolonoscopyveterans

Identifiers

PMID32212093
PMCPMC7280466
OpenAlexW3013373883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.