Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32212075›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020

Occurrence and removal of 10 odorous compounds in drinking water by different treatment processes.

Guixue Feng, Ruibao Jia, Shaohua Sun, Mingquan Wang, Qinghua Zhao, Xiaodong Xin, Li Liu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guixue FengShandong water and waste water monitoring center, Jinan, 250021, China.
Ruibao JiaShandong water and waste water monitoring center, Jinan, 250021, China. jiaruibao1968@163.com.
Shaohua SunShandong water and waste water monitoring center, Jinan, 250021, China. JNGPSJC_sunshaohua@163.com.
Mingquan WangShandong water and waste water monitoring center, Jinan, 250021, China.
Qinghua ZhaoShandong water and waste water monitoring center, Jinan, 250021, China.
Xiaodong XinShandong water and waste water monitoring center, Jinan, 250021, China.
Li LiuShandong water and waste water monitoring center, Jinan, 250021, China.
Shandong Provincial Water Resources Research Institute · CN

Funding

National Major Projects on Water Pollution Control And Management Technology 2017ZX07501003National Major Projects on Water Pollution Control And Management Technology 2017ZX075 02002National Major Projects on Water Pollution Control And Management Technology 2017ZX07502003-06Shandong Natural Science Foundation Project ZR2017MC047Special Project of Taishan Scholar Construction Engineering ts201712084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the prevalence of ten odorous compounds (2-methylisoborneol, trans-1,10-dimethyl-trans-9-decalol, isophorone, 2,4,6-trichloroanisole, 2,3,6-trichloroanisole, 2,3,4-trichloroanisole, β-cyclocitral, β-ionone, 2-isobutyl-3-methyoxypyrazine, and 2-isopropyl-3-methoxypyrazine) in raw drinking water, as well as their removal by traditional processes, advanced oxidation processes, ultrafiltration, and nanofiltration processes, with the use of an ultrahigh-resolution Orbitrap. The most abundant odorous compounds referred to 2-methylisoborneol and trans-1,10-dimethyl-trans-9-decalol with maximal concentrations of 1.6 ng/L and 0.09 ng/L after treatment by traditional processes respectively, and their maximal concentration was 2.05 ng/L and lower than the detection limit after treatment by advanced oxidation processes, while the raw drinking water of the mentioned two processes was different. The high concentration of isophorone in water treated by traditional process, advanced oxidation process, and membrane process was also ascertained. On the whole, the removal rate of membrane process is the maximal for all odorous compounds except for 2,3,6-trichloroanisole, followed by the advanced oxidation process as well as the traditional process. Eight odorous compounds identified in raw water were preserved after traditional treatment, while five compounds were preserved after the advanced oxidation treatment. The combined ultrafiltration and nanofiltration with pre-flocculation was more effective than either the advanced oxidation process or the traditional treating process in removing odorous compounds, and over 90% of all the odorous compounds were removed. Further investigation is required to facilitate the removal of odorous compounds from drinking water by the incorporation of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration units based on current drinking water treatments.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterWater PurificationOdorantsWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater SupplyDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalAdvanced processesDrinking water treatment plantsNanofiltrationOdorous compoundsTraditional processesUltrafiltration

Identifiers

PMID32212075
OpenAlexW3012960410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.