Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211984›Full record

ReviewEmergency radiology2020

Clinical conundrum: concomitant high-risk pulmonary embolism and acute ischemic stroke.

Ka U Lio, David Jiménez, Lisa Moores, Parth Rali

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Emergency radiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acute ischemic stroke and concomitant massive pulmonary embolism: a challenge.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  6. Neurological Complications of Pulmonary Embolism: a Literature Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ka U LioShanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
David JiménezRespiratory Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal and Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria, Universidad de Alcala, Madrid, Spain.
Lisa MooresDepartment of Medicine, F. Edward Hebert School of Medicine, The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Parth RaliDepartment of Thoracic Medicine and Surgery, Lewis Katz School Of Medicine, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Parth.Rali@tuhs.temple.edu.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNTemple University Hospital · USUniformed Services University of the Health Sciences · USUniversidad de Alcalá · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-risk PE can be complicated by the presence of a patent foramen ovale (PFO), which can lead to paradoxical systemic embolization, including cerebral embolism ultimately leading to acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Acute management is challenging given the competing benefits and risks of systemic thrombolysis. Herein, we aim to provide a review of clinical presentations, diagnostic findings, and treatment and outcome from the available literature, with the hopes of providing insight into treatment options. We followed the guidelines outlined by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). A systematic literature search using PubMed/MEDLINE database, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar for all reported cases/case series of concomitant high-risk PE and paradoxical ischemic stroke was conducted from inception to July 2019. Twenty-nine cases from 27 articles (26 single case reports, 1 case series of 3 patients) were included. There were 10 men and 19 women, ranging in age from 29 to 81 years (mean 56.1 ± 13.5 years). PFO was diagnosed in 89.7% of patients, mostly by transesophageal echocardiography. Treatment modalities included systemic thrombolysis (40%), anticoagulation alone (36%), surgical thrombectomy (16%), and percutaneous thrombectomy (8%). Overall mortality rate was 31%. Patients receiving thrombolysis and surgical thrombectomy had the most favorable outcome. Survival to discharge was 90% (9 out of 10), 100% (5 out of 5), and 50% (4 out of 8) in the systemic thrombolysis, surgical thrombectomy, and anticoagulation alone groups respectively. In the setting of combined high-risk PE and ischemic stroke, PFO can be detected in 90% of published cases. Thrombolysis and surgical thrombectomy seem to be effective management, but further studies are needed for validation.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialEmbolism, ParadoxicalForamen Ovale, PatentHumansIschemic StrokePulmonary EmbolismHigh-risk pulmonary embolismParadoxical cerebral embolismParadoxical ischemic strokePatent foramen ovale

Identifiers

PMID32211984
OpenAlexW3013311746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.