Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211969›Full record

SynthesisCurrent urology reports2020

Predictors of Urinary Infections and Urosepsis After Ureteroscopy for Stone Disease: a Systematic Review from EAU Section of Urolithiasis (EULIS).

Shreya Chugh, Amelia Pietropaolo, Emanuele Montanari, Kemal Sarica, Bhaskar K Somani

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current urology reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 93 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
93citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

93 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 160 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Impact of body mass index on size and composition of urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Healthcare resource utilization comparing single-use ureteroscopes with real-time intrarenal pressure monitoring to other single-use ureteroscopes.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

33 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Shreya ChughUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Amelia PietropaoloUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.
Emanuele MontanariDepartment of Urology, Fondazione Ca'Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico di Milano, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Kemal SaricaDepartment of Urology, Biruni University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey.
Bhaskar K SomaniUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK. bhaskarsomani@yahoo.com.
University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBBiruni University · TRUniversity of Milan · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo present the latest evidence related to the predictors of urinary tract infections (UTIs) and urosepsis after ureteroscopy (URS) for stone disease. RECENT

findingsOur review suggests that almost half of all post-URS complications are related to infectious complications although reported rates of urosepsis were low. The use of antibiotic prophylaxis, treatment of pre-operative UTI, and low procedural time seem to reduce this risk. However, the risk is higher in patients with higher Charlson comorbidity index, elderly patients, female gender, long duration of pre-procedural indwelling ureteric stents and patients with a neurogenic bladder and with high BMI. Infectious complications following ureteroscopy can be a source of morbidity and potential mortality. Although majority of these are minor, efforts must be taken to minimise them especially in high-risk patients. This includes the use of prophylactic antibiotics, limiting stent dwell and procedural time, prompt identification and treatment of UTI and urosepsis, and careful planning in patients with large stone burden and multiple comorbidities.

Indexed as

UreteroscopyAge FactorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisComorbidityHumansKidney CalculiOperative TimeOverweightPostoperative ComplicationsRisk FactorsSepsisSex FactorsStentsUreteral CalculiUrinary Bladder, NeurogenicAnti-Bacterial AgentsAccess sheathAntibioticComplicationSepsisStentUreteroscopyUrine cultureUrosepsisUTI

Identifiers

PMID32211969
OpenAlexW3013978638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.