ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2020
Genetic variation (population database) at 20 autosomal STR loci in the population of Rajasthan (north-western India).
Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Layers in the sand: The genetic imprint of migration, culture, and Indus craft in the Thar Desert.HGG advances · 2026Article
- Genomic polymorphism in North-western Indian population based on autosomal STR's: a population data study.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Genetic portrait study for 23 Y-STR loci in the population of Rajasthan, India.International journal of legal medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To explore the genetic diversity and establish the allelic database of the population of Rajasthan, we assessed 571 randomly selected unrelated healthy individuals residing in the state. Blood samples of the selected individuals were collected with the compliance of ethical standards. Locus Penta E was observed to be the most polymorphic (0.908), whereas locus TPOX was observed to be the least polymorphic (0.639). The observed heterozygosity ranged from a minimum of 0.667 (TPOX) to a maximum of 0.925 (Penta E). The combined value of the power of discrimination (PD) and power of exclusion (PE) for all the studied 20 short tandem repeat (STR) loci were observed to be 1 and 0.999999997560235 respectively. The combined values of matching probability (PM) and paternity index (PI) for all the studied 20 STR loci were 7 × 10
Indexed as
Identifiers
32211958What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.