Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211939›Full record

ReviewStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2020

Technological quality requirements for stereotactic radiotherapy : Expert review group consensus from the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy.

Daniela Schmitt, Oliver Blanck, Tobias Gauer, Michael K Fix, Thomas B Brunner, Jens Fleckenstein, Britta Loutfi-Krauss, Peter Manser, Rene Werner, Maria-Lisa Wilhelm and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
19.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Effects of intrafractional motion on targeting accuracy in frameless single-isocenter multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Multicenter multiplatform pattern-of-practice analysis of single-isocenter multitarget stereotactic radiosurgery.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Daniela SchmittKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberger Institut für Radioonkologie (HIRO), Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. Daniela.Schmitt@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9657-0715
Oliver BlanckKlinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Tobias GauerKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Michael K FixAbteilung für Medizinische Strahlenphysik und Universitätsklinik für Radio-Onkologie, Inselspital-Universitätsspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Thomas B BrunnerUniversitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Jens FleckensteinKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Britta Loutfi-KraussKlinik für Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Peter ManserAbteilung für Medizinische Strahlenphysik und Universitätsklinik für Radio-Onkologie, Inselspital-Universitätsspital Bern, Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Rene WernerInstitut für Computational Neuroscience, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Maria-Lisa WilhelmKlinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Wolfgang W BausKlinik für Radioonkologie, CyberKnife- und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Cologne, Germany.
Christos MoustakisKlinik für Strahlentherapie-Radioonkologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Bern · CHGoethe University Frankfurt · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie · DEUniversitätsklinik für Strahlentherapie · DEUniversitätsmedizin Rostock · DEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review details and discusses the technological quality requirements to ensure the desired quality for stereotactic radiotherapy using photon external beam radiotherapy as defined by the DEGRO Working Group Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Radiotherapy and the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. The covered aspects of this review are 1) imaging for target volume definition, 2) patient positioning and target volume localization, 3) motion management, 4) collimation of the irradiation and beam directions, 5) dose calculation, 6) treatment unit accuracy, and 7) dedicated quality assurance measures. For each part, an expert review for current state-of-the-art techniques and their particular technological quality requirement to reach the necessary accuracy for stereotactic radiotherapy divided into intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery in one single fraction (SRS), intracranial fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT), and extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is presented. All recommendations and suggestions for all mentioned aspects of stereotactic radiotherapy are formulated and related uncertainties and potential sources of error discussed. Additionally, further research and development needs in terms of insufficient data and unsolved problems for stereotactic radiotherapy are identified, which will serve as a basis for the future assignments of the DGMP Working Group for Physics and Technology in Stereotactic Radiotherapy. The review was group peer-reviewed, and consensus was obtained through multiple working group meetings.

Indexed as

GermanyQuality Assurance, Health CareRadiation DosageRadiosurgerySocieties, MedicalFSRTRadiosurgeryRecommendationsSBRTSRSTechnique

Identifiers

PMID32211939
PMCPMC7182540
OpenAlexW3012982787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.