Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211931›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Longitudinal mouse-PET imaging: a reliable method for estimating binding parameters without a reference region or blood sampling.

Catriona Wimberley, Duc Loc Nguyen, Charles Truillet, Marie-Anne Peyronneau, Zuhal Gulhan, Matteo Tonietto, Fawzi Boumezbeur, Raphael Boisgard, Sylvie Chalon, Viviane Bouilleret and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Reduced Acquisition Time [Frontiers in medicine · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Catriona WimberleyLaboratoire d'Imagerie Moléculaire In Vivo (IMIV), Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, CEA, Orsay, France. catriona.wimberley@gmail.com.
Duc Loc NguyenLaboratoire d'Imagerie Moléculaire In Vivo (IMIV), Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, CEA, Orsay, France.
Charles TruilletLaboratoire d'Imagerie Moléculaire In Vivo (IMIV), Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, CEA, Orsay, France.
Marie-Anne PeyronneauLaboratoire d'Imagerie Moléculaire In Vivo (IMIV), Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, CEA, Orsay, France.
Zuhal GulhanUMR 1253, iBrain, Inserm, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Matteo ToniettoInstitut du Cerveau et de la Moelle épinière (ICM), Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France.
Fawzi BoumezbeurNeuroSpin, CEA, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Raphael BoisgardLaboratoire d'Imagerie Moléculaire In Vivo (IMIV), Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, CEA, Orsay, France.
Sylvie ChalonUMR 1253, iBrain, Inserm, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Viviane BouilleretLaboratoire d'Imagerie Moléculaire In Vivo (IMIV), Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, CEA, Orsay, France.
Irène BuvatLaboratoire d'Imagerie Moléculaire In Vivo (IMIV), Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, CNRS, CEA, Orsay, France.
Commissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies Alternatives · FRInstitut d'Imagerie Biomédicale · FRInserm · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRPitié-Salpêtrière Hospital · FR

Funding

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions 600382
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longitudinal mouse PET imaging is becoming increasingly popular due to the large number of transgenic and disease models available but faces challenges. These challenges are related to the small size of the mouse brain and the limited spatial resolution of microPET scanners, along with the small blood volume making arterial blood sampling challenging and impossible for longitudinal studies. The ability to extract an input function directly from the image would be useful for quantification in longitudinal small animal studies where there is no true reference region available such as TSPO imaging.

methodsUsing dynamic, whole-body

resultsThe peaks of the IDIFs were strongly correlated with the injected dose (Pearson R = 0.79). The regional correlations between the %ID estimates and autoradiography were R = 0.53 without 4D-RRD and 0.72 with 4D-RRD over all mice and scans. The regional correlations between the V

conclusionWe present a FA approach for IDIF extraction which is robust, reproducible and can be used in quantification methods for resolution recovery, denoising and parameter estimation. We demonstrated that the proposed quantification method yields parameter estimates closer to ex vivo measurements than semi-quantitative methods such as %ID and is immune to tracer binding in tissue unlike reference tissue methods. This approach allows for accurate quantification in longitudinal PET studies in mice while avoiding repeated blood sampling.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsPositron-Emission TomographyAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalMiceFactor analysisImage-derived input functionMousePETTSPO

Identifiers

PMID32211931
PMCPMC7515949
OpenAlexW3013342124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.