ReviewDer Orthopade2020
[Custom made total knee arthroplasty : Review of current literature].
Review in Der Orthopade, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient specific implants versus conventional implants in primary total knee arthroplasty: No significant difference in patient reported outcomes at 5 years.Journal of orthopaedics · 2023Article
- Patient Specific Instruments and Patient Individual Implants-A Narrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Custom-designed total knee replacement has become a standard procedure in some orthopaedic centres worldwide. Due to the lack of literature, the discussion about the hypothetical advantages has remained controversial. It was the aim of this study to focus on the current literature on custom-made total knee arthroplasty. We can demonstrate that custom-made total knee arthroplasty is a reproducible strategy with good clinical results in terms of leg-axis reconstruction, natural kinematics, patient-related outcomes and cost effectiveness. This has led to the fact that the Orthopaedic Data Evaluation Panel (ODEP) of the National Health Service in Great Britain rated the Conformis custom-designed knee replacement in 2017 with a 3D rating.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32211917What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.