ArticleJAMA network open2020
Validation of an Electronic Health Record-Based Suicide Risk Prediction Modeling Approach Across Multiple Health Care Systems.
Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 109 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prediction models for self-harm and suicide: a systematic review and critical appraisal.BMC medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Machine learning algorithms and their predictive accuracy for suicide and self-harm: Systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Role of machine learning algorithms in suicide risk prediction: a systematic review-meta analysis of clinical studies.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Pooled it
- Structured data vs. unstructured data in machine learning prediction models for suicidal behaviors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Pooled it
- Improving risk prediction for target subpopulations: Predicting suicidal behaviors among multiple sclerosis patients.PloS one · 2023Trial
- Big data research: the importance of the data-generating process and domain expertise.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2026Article
- Using smartphone surveys to predict next-week suicide attempts.Journal of psychopathology and clinical science · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Psychiatry: Five Decades of Progress and Persistent Translational Challenges.Psychiatric research and clinical practice · 2026Article
- Prediction of self-harm in people with newly-diagnosed depression: development and validation of risk prediction models.Molecular psychiatry · 2026Article
- Evaluating the role of cost and fairness in machine learning models of suicide risk.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Conceptualization and development of the Maryland suicide data warehouse to improve mortality prediction.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Enhancing cause of death prediction: development and validation of machine learning models using multimodal data across multiple health-care sites.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Suicide attempt risk in autism: a national EHR study of 2.3 million individuals.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Using transfer learning to improve prediction of suicide risk in acute care hospitals.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026Article
- Considerations for evaluating the practical utility of machine learning in suicide risk estimation: the role of cost and equity.Research square · 2025Article
- Prediction of early-onset bipolar using electronic health records.Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines · 2025Article
- Let's Move Towards Precision Suicidology.Current psychiatry reports · 2025Review
- Absence of nonfatal suicidal behavior preceding suicide death reveals differences in clinical risks.Psychiatry research · 2025Article
- Identifying patients at risk of suicide using data from health information exchanges.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Suicide is a leading cause of mortality, with suicide-related deaths increasing in recent years. Automated methods for individualized risk prediction have great potential to address this growing public health threat. To facilitate their adoption, they must first be validated across diverse health care settings. Objective: To evaluate the generalizability and cross-site performance of a risk prediction method using readily available structured data from electronic health records in predicting incident suicide attempts across multiple, independent, US health care systems. Design, Setting, and Participants: For this prognostic study, data were extracted from longitudinal electronic health record data comprising International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnoses, laboratory test results, procedures codes, and medications for more than 3.7 million patients from 5 independent health care systems participating in the Accessible Research Commons for Health network. Across sites, 6 to 17 years' worth of data were available, up to 2018. Outcomes were defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes reflecting incident suicide attempts (with positive predictive value >0.70 according to expert clinician medical record review). Models were trained using naive Bayes classifiers in each of the 5 systems. Models were cross-validated in independent data sets at each site, and performance metrics were calculated. Data analysis was performed from November 2017 to August 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was suicide attempt as defined by a previously validated case definition using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes. The accuracy and timeliness of the prediction were measured at each site. Results: Across the 5 health care systems, of the 3 714 105 patients (2 130 454 female [57.2%]) included in the analysis, 39 162 cases (1.1%) were identified. Predictive features varied by site but, as expected, the most common predictors reflected mental health conditions (eg, borderline personality disorder, with odds ratios of 8.1-12.9, and bipolar disorder, with odds ratios of 0.9-9.1) and substance use disorders (eg, drug withdrawal syndrome, with odds ratios of 7.0-12.9). Despite variation in geographical location, demographic characteristics, and population health characteristics, model performance was similar across sites, with areas under the curve ranging from 0.71 (95% CI, 0.70-0.72) to 0.76 (95% CI, 0.75-0.77). Across sites, at a specificity of 90%, the models detected a mean of 38% of cases a mean of 2.1 years in advance. Conclusions and Relevance: Across 5 diverse health care systems, a computationally efficient approach leveraging the full spectrum of structured electronic health record data was able to detect the risk of suicidal behavior in unselected patients. This approach could facilitate the development of clinical decision support tools that inform risk reduction interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.