Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211854›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation research2020

Who can benefit from a lymph node boost in definitive chemoradiotherapy for node-positive cervical cancer: an evaluation of nodal failure in patients without nodal boost.

Haeyoung Kim, Won Park, Won Kyung Cho

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nodal status in predicting the outcome of treatment with definitive chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer in FIGO IIIC1 and IIIC2 stages.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haeyoung KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Won ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Won Kyung ChoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sungkyunkwan University · KRSamsung Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study was performed to identify risk factors for pelvic nodal failure (PNF) after definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with metastatic pelvic lymph nodes (mPLNs) from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix. We retrospectively reviewed data on 80 patients who received definitive CCRT between 2005 and 2014 at our hospital. All patients underwent brachytherapy and whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) without nodal boost. mPLNs was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. The rate of PNF and factors affecting PNF were analysed. A total of 156 mPLNs were found. The median number of mPLNs was 2 per patient (range 1-6); the median short diameter was 1.7 cm (range 1.0-4.2 cm). After a median follow-up of 64 months, 10 (6.4%) mPLNs failed in 13 (16.3%) patients. The 5-year PNF-free survival (PNFFS), disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 83.4, 62.7 and 74.7%, respectively. The mPLN size was not associated with the risk of PNF. However, pre-radiotherapy SCC antigen (SCC-Ag) >6.8 ng/mL and number of mPLNs >2 were significant risk factors for PNF. Using the two risk factors, we categorized the patients into three risk groups. The 5-year PNFFS rates in patients with 0, 1 and 2 risk factors were 100.0, 78.3 and 44.4%, respectively (P < 0.01). SCC-Ag level and number of mPLNs were significant factors for PNF. Patients with both risk factors developed frequent PNF after WPRT without nodal boost. The two risk factors can be a guide in deciding whether to administer nodal boost radiotherapy.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdultAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosislymph nodesradiotherapy dosagerisk factorsuterine cervical neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID32211854
PMCPMC7299268
OpenAlexW3013047667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.