ArticleJournal of radiation research2020
Who can benefit from a lymph node boost in definitive chemoradiotherapy for node-positive cervical cancer: an evaluation of nodal failure in patients without nodal boost.
Article in Journal of radiation research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nodal status in predicting the outcome of treatment with definitive chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer in FIGO IIIC1 and IIIC2 stages.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2026Article
- Whether individualized dose escalation should be recommended for lymph nodes with different sizes in the definitive radiotherapy of cervical cancer?Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2022Article
- Patterns of definitive radiotherapy practice for cervical cancer in South Korea: a survey endorsed by the Korean Radiation Oncology Group (KROG 20-06).Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2021Article
- Treatment Strategies and Prognostic Factors of 2018 FIGO Stage IIIC Cervical Cancer: A Review.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
- Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors in Stage III C Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Radiotherapy or Radiochemotherapy.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was performed to identify risk factors for pelvic nodal failure (PNF) after definitive concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) in patients with metastatic pelvic lymph nodes (mPLNs) from squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the cervix. We retrospectively reviewed data on 80 patients who received definitive CCRT between 2005 and 2014 at our hospital. All patients underwent brachytherapy and whole-pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) without nodal boost. mPLNs was diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography. The rate of PNF and factors affecting PNF were analysed. A total of 156 mPLNs were found. The median number of mPLNs was 2 per patient (range 1-6); the median short diameter was 1.7 cm (range 1.0-4.2 cm). After a median follow-up of 64 months, 10 (6.4%) mPLNs failed in 13 (16.3%) patients. The 5-year PNF-free survival (PNFFS), disease-free survival and overall survival rates were 83.4, 62.7 and 74.7%, respectively. The mPLN size was not associated with the risk of PNF. However, pre-radiotherapy SCC antigen (SCC-Ag) >6.8 ng/mL and number of mPLNs >2 were significant risk factors for PNF. Using the two risk factors, we categorized the patients into three risk groups. The 5-year PNFFS rates in patients with 0, 1 and 2 risk factors were 100.0, 78.3 and 44.4%, respectively (P < 0.01). SCC-Ag level and number of mPLNs were significant factors for PNF. Patients with both risk factors developed frequent PNF after WPRT without nodal boost. The two risk factors can be a guide in deciding whether to administer nodal boost radiotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.