Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211749›Full record

SynthesisJournal of Crohn's & colitis2020

Systematic Review of Development and Content Validity of Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Do We Measure What We Measure?

Emma M van Andel, Brechtje D M Koopmann, Femke Crouwel, Casper G Noomen, Nanne K H de Boer, Dirk P van Asseldonk, Lidwine B Mokkink

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anti-IL-12/23p40 antibodies for induction of remission in Crohn's disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Colorectal Surgery.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Role of Quality of Life as Endpoint for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma M van AndelDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Brechtje D M KoopmannDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Femke CrouwelDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Casper G NoomenDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Nanne K H de BoerAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam; Gastroenterology and Metabolism Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dirk P van AsseldonkDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands.
Lidwine B MokkinkAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics; Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPatient-reported outcome measures are increasingly important in daily care and research in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. This study provides an overview of the content and content validity of IBD-specific patient-reported outcome measures on three selected constructs.

methodsDatabases were searched up to May 2019 for development and/or content validity studies on IBD-specific self-report measures on health-related quality of life, disability, and self-report disease activity in adults. Evidence was synthesised on content validity in three aspects: relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility following the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments methodology. Questionnaire items were organised in themes to provide an overview of important aspects of these constructs.

resultsFor 14/44 instruments, 25 content validity studies were identified and 25/44 measures had sufficient content validity, the strongest evidence being of moderate quality, though most evidence is of low or very low quality. The Crohn's Life Impact Questionnaire and IBD questionnaire-32 on quality of life, the IBD-Control on disease activity, and the IBD Disability Index Self-Report and its 8-item version on disability, have the strongest evidence of sufficient relevance, comprehensiveness, and comprehensibility, ranging from moderate to very low quality. A fair number of recurring items themes, possibly important for the selected constructs, was identified.

conclusionsThe body of evidence for content validity of IBD-specific health-related quality of life, self-report disease activity, and disability self-report measures is limited. More content validity studies should be performed after reaching consensus on the constructs of interest for IBD, and studies should involve patients.

Indexed as

Inflammatory Bowel DiseasesPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresHumansReproducibility of ResultsContent validityinflammatory bowel diseasespatient-reported outcome measures

Identifiers

PMID32211749
PMCPMC7493218
OpenAlexW2911561967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.