Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211588›Full record

ReviewJOR spine2020

Pathomechanism of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Takeshi Oichi, Yuki Taniguchi, Yasushi Oshima, Sakae Tanaka, Taku Saito

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JOR spine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Deletion of aJOR spine · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. TRPC6-Mediated CaCells · 2026
    Article
  19. Intervertebral disc degeneration.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Takeshi OichiSensory & Motor System Medicine, Faculty of Medicine The University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8009-1648
Yuki TaniguchiSensory & Motor System Medicine, Faculty of Medicine The University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo Japan.
Yasushi OshimaSensory & Motor System Medicine, Faculty of Medicine The University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo Japan.
Sakae TanakaSensory & Motor System Medicine, Faculty of Medicine The University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo Japan.
Taku SaitoSensory & Motor System Medicine, Faculty of Medicine The University of Tokyo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intervertebral disc degeneration (IDD) is the main contributor to low back pain, which is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Although substantial progress has been made in elucidating the molecular mechanisms of IDD, fundamental and long-lasting treatments for IDD are still lacking. With increased understanding of the complex pathomechanism of IDD, alternative strategies for treating IDD can be discovered. A brief overview of the prevalence and epidemiologic risk factors of IDD is provided in this review, followed by the descriptions of anatomic, cellular, and molecular structure of the intervertebral disc as well as the molecular pathophysiology of IDD. Finally, the recent findings of intervertebral disc progenitors are reviewed and the future perspectives are discussed.

Indexed as

epidemiologygeneticintervertebral disc degenerationprevalenceprogenitors

Identifiers

PMID32211588
PMCPMC7084053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.