ArticleJNCI cancer spectrum2020
Prospective Evaluation of Universal
Article in JNCI cancer spectrum, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Canadian Recommendations for Germline Genetic Testing of Patients with Breast Cancer: A Call to Action.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Article
- Pathogenic Germline Variants in Patients With Metaplastic Breast Cancer.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Outcomes of the "BRCA Quality Improvement Dissemination Program": An initiative to improve patient receipt of cancer genetics services at five health systems.Gynecologic oncology · 2023Article
- Challenges for clinical application of "TRACEBACK" study: testing of historical Tubo-Ovarian cancer patients for hereditary risk genes.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Prevalence ofMolecular and clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- A systematic review of the international prevalence ofClinical epidemiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLimited published literature exists on women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) diagnosed over the age of 60 years with breast cancer gene (
methodsA prospective study of 395 women with TNBC underwent genetic counseling and 380 (96.2%) underwent clinical
resultsFifty-one of 380 (13.4%) women with TNBC who underwent clinical
conclusionsOur study does not support universal
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.