ArticleArthroplasty today2020
Portable compression devices in total joint arthroplasty: poor outpatient compliance.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rural-Urban Differences in Hospital and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Postoperative venous thromboembolism event increases risk of readmissions and reoperation following total joint arthroplasty: a propensity-matched cohort study.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAspirin and mechanical compression devices are approved means of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis after total joint arthroplasty. Prior studies of mechanical compression pumps after joint arthroplasty have been limited to the inpatient setting. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outpatient compliance and utilization factors in a rural population after elective hip or knee arthroplasty.
methodsUtilization for portable pneumatic compression pumps after joint arthroplasty was prospectively recorded (hours). Compliance was defined as the recommended 20 hours per day. A questionnaire 2 weeks postoperatively assessed factors that may contribute to noncompliance. Patients were followed up for 90 days postoperatively to record VTE events.
resultsData were collected for 115 joint arthroplasty patients (50 hips, 65 knees). Postdischarge day one had the highest average usage at 13.2 hours/day (66.0%, range 0%-100%), but this number fell to 4.8 hours/day (24.0, range 0%-100%) by day 14. Patient compliance (>20 hours use/day) was highest on postdischarge day one at 40 patients (34.7%). By postdischarge day 14, patient compliance fell to 17 patients (14.8%). Difficulty using the pumps (
conclusionsThis study demonstrated poor outpatient compliance with portable pneumatic compression devices. Poor compliance was related to pump heat and difficulty with pump use. Even with poor compliance, a low incidence of VTE events was observed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.