ArticlePeerJ2020
Development and psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale: OES-Pt.
Article in PeerJ, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Bleaching with biocatalysts and violet LED: a randomized clinical trial using a hybrid design with parallel-group and split-mouth approaches : Violet LED and biocatalysts in in-office whitening: a split-mouth trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Impact of the in-office bleaching gels pH on tooth sensitivity in combined bleaching techniques: a randomized clinical trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Trial
- Bleaching efficacy of in-office dental bleaching with different application protocols: a single-blind randomized controlled trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Trial
- In-office dental bleaching in adolescents using 6% hydrogen peroxide with different application tips: randomized clinical trial.Journal of applied oral science : revista FOB · 2023Trial
- Measuring concern about smile appearance among adults.European journal of orthodontics · 2024Observational
- Development and validation of the Italian version of the Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES-I).Clinical oral investigations · 2023Article
- Differential Item Functioning of the Jaw Functional Limitation ScaleJournal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2023Article
- Aesthetic dental treatment, orofacial appearance, and life satisfaction of Finnish and Brazilian adults.PloS one · 2023Article
- Comparison of two rating scales with the orofacial esthetic scale and practical recommendations for its application.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2022Article
- Observational
- Perception of orofacial appearance among laypersons with diverse social and demographic status.PloS one · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe Orofacial Esthetic Scale (OES) is an instrument to assess an individual's perception of their Orofacial Appearance (OA). However, its translation and evaluation of psychometric properties is necessary for its use in Brazilian individuals.
objectivesTo develop the Portuguese version of OES (OES-Pt), estimate its psychometric properties (validity, measurement invariance and reliability) when applied to Brazilian individuals aged 18-40 years, and estimate the relationship between sociodemographic characteristics and OA.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional study using a convenience sample. The sample consisted of 1,072 Brazilian individuals (70.1% female, 25.1% dental patients; mean ± SD age: 25.7 ± 5.7 years). After cross-cultural adaptation of OES-Pt, factorial validity was evaluated by confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent validity (average variance extracted (AVE)) and reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) and Composite Reliability (CR)) were also estimated. Concurrent validity was assessed (Pearson's correlational analysis (
resultsOES-Pt presented adequate fit to the sample. Convergent validity (AVE ≥ 0.56) and reliability (α and CR ≥ 0.89) were adequate. Concurrent validity was adequate (
conclusionsWhen measuring OA in Brazilian individuals, the OES-Pt was valid, reliable and invariant for independent samples. Age, sex and SES were weak or not statistically significantly related to OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.