Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211216›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2020

Imaging of intranasal drug delivery to the brain.

Michael C Veronesi, Mosa Alhamami, Shelby B Miedema, Yeonhee Yun, Miguel Ruiz-Cardozo, Michael W Vannier

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Imaging of intranasal drug delivery to the brain: updated review 2.0.Drug delivery and translational research · 2026
    Review
  2. Intranasal essential oils in therapy: advances in clinical applications and delivery mechanisms.Journal of traditional Chinese medicine = Chung i tsa chih ying wen pan · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Research progress on intranasal treatment for Parkinson's disease.Neuroprotection (Chichester, England) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Michael C VeronesiDepartment of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine USA.
Mosa AlhamamiDepartment of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine USA.
Shelby B MiedemaDepartment of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine USA.
Yeonhee YunDepartment of Radiology & Imaging Sciences, Indiana University School of Medicine USA.
Miguel Ruiz-CardozoClinical Research Institute, Universidad Nacional de Colombia School of Medicine USA.
Michael W VannierDepartment of Radiology, University of Chicago School of Medicine USA.
Indiana University · USUniversidad Nacional de Colombia · COUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Indianapolis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intranasal (IN) delivery is a rapidly developing area for therapies with great potential for the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) diseases. Moreover, in vivo imaging is becoming an important part of therapy assessment, both clinically in humans and translationally in animals. IN drug delivery is an alternative to systemic administration that uses the direct anatomic pathway between the olfactory/trigeminal neuroepithelium of the nasal mucosa and the brain. Several drugs have already been approved for IN application, while others are undergoing development and testing. To better understand which imaging modalities are being used to assess IN delivery of therapeutics, we performed a literature search with the key words "Intranasal delivery" and "Imaging" and summarized these findings in the current review. While this review does not attempt to be fully comprehensive, we intend for the examples provided to allow a well-rounded picture of the imaging tools available to assess IN delivery, with an emphasis on the nose-to-brain delivery route. Examples of in vivo imaging, for both humans and animals, include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET), single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), gamma scintigraphy and computed tomography (CT). Additionally, some in vivo optical imaging modalities, including bioluminescence and fluorescence, have been used more in experimental testing in animals. In this review, we introduce each imaging modality, how it is being utilized and outline its strengths and weaknesses, specifically in the context of IN delivery of therapeutics to the brain.

Indexed as

blood-brain barrierIntranasal drug deliverymultimodality imagingtheranostics

Identifiers

PMID32211216
PMCPMC7076302
OpenAlexW3013886593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.