Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211200›Full record

ArticleComputation (Basel, Switzerland)2014

SBMLSimulator: A Java Tool for Model Simulation and Parameter Estimation in Systems Biology.

Alexander Dörr, Roland Keller, Andreas Zell, Andreas Dräger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computation (Basel, Switzerland), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Construction of integrated gene logic-chip.Nature nanotechnology · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexander DörrCenter for Bioinformatics Tuebingen (ZBIT), University of Tuebingen, Sand 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Roland KellerCenter for Bioinformatics Tuebingen (ZBIT), University of Tuebingen, Sand 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas ZellCenter for Bioinformatics Tuebingen (ZBIT), University of Tuebingen, Sand 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas DrägerCenter for Bioinformatics Tuebingen (ZBIT), University of Tuebingen, Sand 1, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

Continued Support of Essential SBML Software and Community ResourcesR01GM070923 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI HUCKA, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2018
$8.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070923
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The identification of suitable model parameters for biochemical reactions has been recognized as a quite difficult endeavor. Parameter values from literature or experiments can often not directly be combined in complex reaction systems. Nature-inspired optimization techniques can find appropriate sets of parameters that calibrate a model to experimentally obtained time series data. We present SBMLsimulator, a tool that combines the Systems Biology Simulation Core Library for dynamic simulation of biochemical models with the heuristic optimization framework EvA2. SBMLsimulator provides an intuitive graphical user interface with various options as well as a fully-featured command-line interface for large-scale and script-based model simulation and calibration. In a parameter estimation study based on a published model and artificial data we demonstrate the capability of SBMLsimulator to identify parameters. SBMLsimulator is useful for both, the interactive simulation and exploration of the parameter space and for the large-scale model calibration and estimation of uncertain parameter values.

Indexed as

ordinary differential equation (ODE) modelingparameter estimationsimulationSystems Biology Markup Language (SBML)

Identifiers

PMID32211200
PMCPMC7093077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.