Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211157›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2020

Mass-abundance scaling in avian communities is maintained after tropical selective logging.

Cindy C P Cosset, James J Gilroy, Umesh Srinivasan, Matthew G Hethcoat, David P Edwards

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Cindy C P CossetDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3624-3277
James J GilroySchool of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich UK.
Umesh SrinivasanProgram in Science, Technology and Environmental Policy Woodrow Wilson School for Public and International Affairs Princeton University Princeton NJ USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8040-1124
Matthew G HethcoatDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
David P EdwardsDepartment of Animal and Plant Sciences University of Sheffield Sheffield UK.
University of Sheffield · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBWoodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Selective logging dominates forested landscapes across the tropics. Despite the structural damage incurred, selectively logged forests typically retain more biodiversity than other forest disturbances. Most logging impact studies consider conventional metrics, like species richness, but these can conceal subtle biodiversity impacts. The mass-abundance relationship is an integral feature of ecological communities, describing the negative relationship between body mass and population abundance, where, in a system without anthropogenic influence, larger species are less abundant due to higher energy requirements. Changes in this relationship can indicate community structure and function changes.We investigated the impacts of selective logging on the mass-abundance scaling of avian communities by conducting a meta-analysis to examine its pantropical trend. We divide our analysis between studies using mist netting, sampling the understory avian community, and point counts, sampling the entire community.Across 19 mist-netting studies, we found no consistent effects of selective logging on mass-abundance scaling relative to primary forests, except for the

Indexed as

biodiversitybirdslocal size–density relationshipmass–abundance relationshipproduction forestsize distribution

Identifiers

PMID32211157
PMCPMC7083669
OpenAlexW3006883823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.