Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211127›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2020

Landmark Technique vs Ultrasound-Guided Approach for Posterior Tibial Nerve Block in Cadaver Models.

Ashish Shah, Sara Morris, Bradley Alexander, Haley McKissack, James Rush Jones, Chandler Tedder, Aaradhana J Jha, Rasesh Desai

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Anatomical landmarks for ankle block.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Tibial Nerve Block as Treatment of Chronic Foot Pain.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashish Shah1Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1201 11th Ave S #200, Birmingham, AL 35205 USA.
Sara Morris2Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA.
Bradley Alexander1Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1201 11th Ave S #200, Birmingham, AL 35205 USA.
Haley McKissack1Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1201 11th Ave S #200, Birmingham, AL 35205 USA.
James Rush Jones1Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1201 11th Ave S #200, Birmingham, AL 35205 USA.
Chandler Tedder1Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1201 11th Ave S #200, Birmingham, AL 35205 USA.
Aaradhana J Jha1Division of Foot and Ankle, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1201 11th Ave S #200, Birmingham, AL 35205 USA.
Rasesh Desai3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Kentucky Albert B. Chandler Hospital, Lexington, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USAlbert B. Chandler Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of ultrasound for peripheral nerve blocks has proven extremely useful for improving the accuracy and efficacy of many regional anesthetic techniques. There remain a few nerve blocks which have lagged behind in employing the assistance of ultrasound consistently, one of which is the ankle block. This block is commonly utilized for either surgical anesthesia or post-operative analgesia for a variety of foot and ankle procedures. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of traditional anatomical landmark-guided technique with an ultrasound-guided approach for ankle block by assessing the spread of injectate along the posterior tibial nerve (PTN) in cadaver models. MATERIALS AND

methodsTen below-knee cadaver specimens were used for this study. Five were randomly chosen to undergo anatomical landmark-guided PTN blocks, and five were selected for ultrasound-guided PTN blocks. The anatomical landmark technique was performed by identifying the medial malleolus and Achilles tendon and inserting the needle (4 cm long, 21G Braun

resultsThe PTN was successfully coated with dye in all five (100%) ultrasound-guided blocks. In the anatomical landmark group, two (40%) PTN were successfully coated with dye. Of the three unsuccessful attempts, two specimens were noted to have dye injected posterior to the PTN; dye was injected into the flexor digitorum longus tendon in one.

conclusionThe base of evidence has dramatically increased in recent years in support of the use of ultrasound in regional anesthesia. This study substantiates the superiority of ultrasound guidance for ankle block by demonstrating a 100% success rate of delivering a simulated nerve block to the correct anatomic location.

Indexed as

CadaverNerve blockPosterior tibial blockTibial nerve blockUltrasound guided block

Identifiers

PMID32211127
PMCPMC7065735
OpenAlexW3021566595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.