Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32211121›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology2020

Pectoral Nerve (PECs) block for postoperative analgesia-a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.

Zhaosheng Jin, Ru Li, Tong J Gan, Yaohua He, Jun Lin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Role of Regional Anesthesia in ICU Pain Management.Current pain and headache reports · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Intraoperative ultrasound-guided pectoral nerve blocks for cardiac implantable device procedures.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  10. Pectoral Nerve Block II for Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.Annals of noninvasive electrocardiology : the official journal of the International Society for Holter and Noninvasive Electrocardiology, Inc · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Pectoral nerve block and acute pain management after breast reduction surgery in adolescent patients.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhaosheng JinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA.
Ru LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA.
Tong J GanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA.
Yaohua HeTaiho Oncology, Inc. Princeton, NJ 08540, USA.
Jun LinDepartment of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center Stony Brook, NY 11794-8480, USA.
Stony Brook Medicine · USTaiho Oncology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivePectoral Nerve (PECs) block is a fascial plane block first described by Blanco et al. for postoperative analgesia in breast surgery. The procedure is now widely used, and several small clinical trials have been published and reported favorably on the analgesic efficacy of PECs block. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we will summarize the current evidence on the efficacy of PECs block.

methodsWe identified and analyzed 19 randomized control trials from PubMed, Central, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science citation index, US clinical trials register and Google Scholar. The primary outcome was 24-hour opioid requirement, and secondary outcomes included pain scores, postoperative nausea and vomiting and other complications.

resultsCompared to systemic analgesia, PECs block was associated with reduced 24 hours opioid requirement [mean difference (MD) = -10.66 mg], lower pain score [9-12 hours postoperatively: MD = -1.18; 24 hours postoperatively: MD = -0.79] and less frequent PONV [risk ratio (RR) = 0.37, numbers needed to treat (NNT) = 5]. While the failure rate of PECs block was not well defined, several studies reported significant intraoperative opioid requirement despite PECs block. Lastly, trial sequential analysis indicated that no more clinical trials are needed to demonstrate the opioid sparing effect of PECs block.

conclusionWhen compared to general anesthesia with systemic opioids, PECs block was associated with significantly better perioperative pain control. There are currently insufficient data on the complication and failure rate of PECs block in clinical practice.

Indexed as

acute painpain outcome measurementpostoperative painTruncal blocks

Identifiers

PMID32211121
PMCPMC7076325
OpenAlexW3013440562

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.